Suppr超能文献

中国鼻咽癌患者出院后的生活质量与应对方式

Quality of life and coping styles in Chinese nasopharyngeal cancer patients after hospitalization.

作者信息

He Guoping, Liu Shan

机构信息

Xiang-Ya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;28(3):179-86. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200505000-00003.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to describe the quality of life (QOL) and coping style of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after hospitalization and to explore the relationship between coping style and health-related QOL of NPC patients. A descriptive correlational design was used in this study. Ninety-eight NPC patients were investigated by a convenient sampling method. Three instruments were employed for data collection. Demographic Information Sheet was used to collect the subjects' demographic characteristics. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H & N) was used to measure health-related QOL. The Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS) was used to measure coping styles. Descriptive analysis and Spearman correlation analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 10.0. Data collection was done from September 2002 to December 2002. The standard score of FACT-H & N for subjects was 67.83%. Patients scored lowest on the Head and Neck subscale. With a mean score of 2.09 +/- 0.53, patient scored the "optimistic" highest on JCS. Some other coping styles scored were "self-reliant"(1.68 +/- 0.49), "palliative" (1.51 +/- 0.60), "emotive"(0.84 +/- 0.59), "fatalistic"(0.92 +/- 0.70), and "evasive"(1.27 +/- 0.44). There were positive correlations between "optimistic," "palliative," and QOL; the coefficient r were 0.456 and 0.324, respectively. There were negative correlations between "emotive," "fatalistic," "evasive," and QOL; the coefficient r were -0.465, -0.427, and -0.271, respectively. No significant correlations were found among "confrontative," "self-reliant," "supportive," and QOL, P > .05. The adverse effects of radiation remain the major problems that affect the health-related QOL of NPC patients posttherapy. Positive emotion-focused coping styles were positively correlated to QOL, and negative emotion-focused ones negatively correlated. Problem-focused coping styles were not statistically correlated to QOL among NPC patients posttherapy. The findings of this study suggest that nurses need to pay attention to the QOL of NPC patients posttherapy, including appropriate education to minimize ongoing adverse effects and support the use of effective coping styles.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述鼻咽癌(NPC)患者出院后的生活质量(QOL)和应对方式,并探讨应对方式与NPC患者健康相关生活质量之间的关系。本研究采用描述性相关设计。通过方便抽样法对98例NPC患者进行了调查。使用三种工具收集数据。人口信息表用于收集受试者的人口统计学特征。癌症治疗功能评估-头颈版(FACT-H&N)用于测量健康相关生活质量。Jalowiec应对量表(JCS)用于测量应对方式。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)10.0进行描述性分析和Spearman相关性分析。数据收集于2002年9月至2002年12月进行。受试者的FACT-H&N标准分为67.83%。患者在头颈子量表上得分最低。患者在JCS上“乐观”得分最高,平均分为2.09±0.53。其他一些应对方式的得分分别为“自力更生”(1.68±0.49)、“姑息”(1.51±0.60)、“情感”(0.84±0.59)、“宿命论”(0.92±0.70)和“回避”(1.27±0.44)。“乐观”、“姑息”与生活质量呈正相关;相关系数r分别为0.456和0.324。“情感”、“宿命论”、“回避”与生活质量呈负相关;相关系数r分别为-0.465、-0.427和-0.271。在“对抗性”、“自力更生”、“支持性”与生活质量之间未发现显著相关性,P>.05。放疗的不良反应仍然是影响NPC患者治疗后健康相关生活质量的主要问题。积极的以情绪为中心的应对方式与生活质量呈正相关,消极的以情绪为中心的应对方式与生活质量呈负相关。在NPC患者治疗后,以问题为中心的应对方式与生活质量无统计学相关性。本研究结果表明,护士需要关注NPC患者治疗后的生活质量,包括进行适当的教育以尽量减少持续的不良反应,并支持使用有效的应对方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验