• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内隐学习中对刺激结构的期望。

Expectations about stimulus structure in implicit learning.

作者信息

Pothos Emmanuel M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymnon, Greece.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2005 Jan;33(1):171-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03195306.

DOI:10.3758/bf03195306
PMID:15915802
Abstract

In two experiments, artificial grammar learning was used to create learning tasks of identical symbolic complexity that differed in terms of the instructions and the appearance of the stimuli. In Experiment 1, the stimuli were letter strings that appeared in either upper- or lowercase; however, letter case was irrelevant to the learning task. Participants were unable to take into account the instruction to ignore letter case. In Experiment 2, the stimuli were sequences of cities that corresponded to the routes of a traveling salesman. It was assumed that participants would adopt the expectation that the salesman would prefer short journeys. When the structure of the stimuli was inconsistent with this expectation, performance on the learning task was inhibited. The results suggest that there are circumstances in which explicit expectations about the structure of a set of stimuli can affect implicit learning of the stimuli.

摘要

在两项实验中,人工语法学习被用于创建具有相同符号复杂性的学习任务,这些任务在指令和刺激的外观方面存在差异。在实验1中,刺激是由大写或小写字母组成的字符串;然而,字母大小写与学习任务无关。参与者无法考虑忽略字母大小写的指令。在实验2中,刺激是与旅行推销员路线相对应的城市序列。假设参与者会形成这样的预期,即推销员会倾向于选择短程路线。当刺激的结构与这种预期不一致时,学习任务的表现就会受到抑制。结果表明,在某些情况下,对一组刺激结构的明确预期会影响对这些刺激的隐性学习。

相似文献

1
Expectations about stimulus structure in implicit learning.内隐学习中对刺激结构的期望。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Jan;33(1):171-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03195306.
2
Does stimulus appearance affect learning?刺激呈现会影响学习吗?
Am J Psychol. 2006 Summer;119(2):275-99.
3
Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.人工语法学习中的隐性和显性知识库。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(5):875-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.875.
4
Implicit learning deficits among adults with developmental dyslexia.发育性阅读障碍成年人的内隐学习缺陷
Ann Dyslexia. 2016 Jul;66(2):235-50. doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0121-7. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
5
Investigating learning deficits associated with dyslexia.
Dyslexia. 2004 Feb;10(1):61-76. doi: 10.1002/dys.266.
6
Implicit learning of two artificial grammars.内隐学习两种人工语法。
Cogn Process. 2021 Feb;22(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00996-2. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Role of prior knowledge in implicit and explicit learning of artificial grammars.先验知识在人工语法的内隐学习和外显学习中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Aug;28:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
8
Artificial grammar learning is facilitated by distributed practice: Evidence from a letter reordering task.分布式练习促进人工语法学习:来自字母重排任务的证据。
Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):55-67. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01048-z. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
Implicit learning is order dependent.内隐学习是依赖顺序的。
Psychol Res. 2017 Jan;81(1):204-218. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0715-4. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Implicit learning: robustness in the face of psychiatric disorders.内隐学习:面对精神疾病时的稳健性。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1988 Sep;17(5):425-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01067228.

引用本文的文献

1
Does complexity matter? Meta-analysis of learner performance in artificial grammar tasks.复杂性重要吗?人工语法任务中学习者表现的荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 25;5:1084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01084. eCollection 2014.
2
Artificial grammar learning of melody is constrained by melodic inconsistency: Narmour's principles affect melodic learning.旋律的人工语法学习受到旋律不一致性的限制:纳摩尔原则影响旋律学习。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 9;8(7):e66174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066174. Print 2013.
3
An entropy model for artificial grammar learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.多维标度、树拟合和聚类。
Science. 1980 Oct 24;210(4468):390-8. doi: 10.1126/science.210.4468.390.
2
Information about the logical structure of a category affects generalization.
Br J Psychol. 2004 Aug;95(Pt 3):371-86. doi: 10.1348/0007126041528158.
3
Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition.意识和内隐认知的主观测量
Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1060-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03196127.
一种用于人工语法学习的熵模型。
Front Psychol. 2010 Jun 17;1:16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00016. eCollection 2010.
4
Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning.人工语法学习中的回忆、流畅性与显性/隐性区分
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Dec;132(4):551-65. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.551.
5
Effects of divided attention and speeded responding on implicit and explicit retrieval of artificial grammar knowledge.分散注意力和快速反应对人工语法知识的内隐和外显提取的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):703-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03196109.
6
The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning.人工语法学习中对照组的使用。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Jan;56(1):97-115. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000297.
7
The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process.结构单纯曝光效应与内隐学习过程之间的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Nov;54(4):1087-104. doi: 10.1080/713756009.
8
Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure.序列学习可以是内隐的吗?来自过程分离程序的新证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):343-50. doi: 10.3758/bf03196171.
9
A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge.一种关于隐性知识和显性知识的理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Oct;22(5):735-55; discussion 755-808. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99002186.
10
Beyond dissociation logic: evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning.超越解离逻辑:人工语法学习中受控和自动影响的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Dec;129(4):457-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.457.