Suppr超能文献

南亚和东南亚的输精管切除术手术技术。

Vasectomy surgical techniques in South and South East Asia.

作者信息

Labrecque Michel, Pile John, Sokal David, Kaza Ramachandra C M, Rahman Mizanur, Bodh S S, Bhattarai Jeewan, Bhatt Ganesh D, Vaidya Tika Man

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2005 May 25;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-5-10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Simple ligation of the vas with suture material and excision of a small vas segment is believed to be the most common vasectomy occlusion technique performed in low-resource settings. Ligation and excision (LE) is associated with a risk of occlusion and contraceptive failure which can be reduced by performing fascial interposition (FI) along with LE. Combining FI with intra luminal thermal cautery could be even more effective. The objective of this study was to determine the surgical vasectomy techniques currently used in five Asian countries and to evaluate the facilitating and limiting factors to introduction and assessment of FI and thermal cautery in these countries.

METHODS

Between December 2003 and February 2004, 3 to 6 major vasectomy centers from Cambodia, Thailand, India, Nepal, and Bangladesh were visited and interviews with 5 to 11 key informants in each country were conducted. Vasectomy techniques performed in each center were observed. Vasectomy techniques using hand-held, battery-driven cautery devices and FI were demonstrated and performed under supervision by local providers. Information about interest and open-mindedness regarding the use of thermal cautery and/or FI was gathered.

RESULTS

The use of vasectomy was marginal in Thailand and Cambodia. In India, Nepal, and Bangladesh, vasectomy was supported by national reproductive health programs. Most vasectomies were performed using the No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) technique and simple LE. The addition of FI to LE, although largely known, was seldom performed. The main reasons reported were: 1) insufficient surgical skills, 2) time needed to perform the technique, and 3) technique not being mandatory according to country standards. Thermal cautery devices for vasectomy were not available in any selected countries. Pilot hands-on assessment showed that the technique could be safely and effectively performed by Asian providers. However, in addition to provision of supplies, introducing cautery with FI could be associated with the same barriers encountered when introducing FI in combination with LE.

CONCLUSION

Further studies assessing the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of implementation are needed before thermal cautery combined with FI is introduced in Asia on a large scale. Until thermal cautery is introduced in a country, vasectomy providers should practice LE with FI to maximize effectiveness of vasectomy procedure.

摘要

背景

使用缝合材料对输精管进行简单结扎并切除一小段输精管,被认为是在资源匮乏地区最常用的输精管结扎绝育技术。结扎与切除(LE)存在闭塞和避孕失败的风险,通过在LE的基础上进行筋膜间置(FI)可降低这种风险。将FI与管腔内热烧灼相结合可能会更有效。本研究的目的是确定五个亚洲国家目前使用的输精管结扎手术技术,并评估在这些国家引入和评估FI及热烧灼的促进因素和限制因素。

方法

在2003年12月至2004年2月期间,走访了柬埔寨、泰国、印度、尼泊尔和孟加拉国的3至6个主要输精管结扎中心,并在每个国家与5至11名关键信息提供者进行了访谈。观察了每个中心所采用的输精管结扎技术。由当地医疗人员在监督下演示并实施了使用手持式电池驱动烧灼设备和FI的输精管结扎技术。收集了有关对使用热烧灼和/或FI的兴趣和开放态度的信息。

结果

在泰国和柬埔寨,输精管结扎的使用较少。在印度、尼泊尔和孟加拉国,输精管结扎得到国家生殖健康项目的支持。大多数输精管结扎手术采用无刀输精管结扎术(NSV)技术和简单的LE。虽然LE加FI在很大程度上是已知的,但很少实施。报告的主要原因有:1)手术技能不足;2)实施该技术所需的时间;3)根据国家标准该技术并非强制性的。在任何选定的国家都没有用于输精管结扎的热烧灼设备。试点实践评估表明,亚洲医疗人员能够安全有效地实施该技术。然而,除了提供物资外,引入带FI的烧灼术可能会遇到与引入FI与LE相结合时相同的障碍。

结论

在亚洲大规模引入热烧灼与FI相结合的技术之前,需要进一步研究评估其有效性、安全性和实施的可行性。在一个国家引入热烧灼之前,输精管结扎手术人员应练习LE加FI,以最大限度提高输精管结扎手术的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验