Demidova Tatiana N, Hamblin Michael R
Massachusetts General Hospital, BAR314B, 40 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114-2698, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jun;49(6):2329-35. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2329-2335.2005.
Photodynamic therapy involves the use of nontoxic dyes called photosensitizers and visible light to produce reactive oxygen species and cell killing. It is being studied as an alternative method of killing pathogens in localized infections due to the increasing problem of multiantibiotic resistance. Although much has been learned about the mechanisms of microbial killing, there is still uncertainty about whether dyes must bind to and penetrate various classes of microbe in order to produce effective killing after illumination. In this report, we compare the interactions of three antimicrobial photosensitizers: rose bengal (RB), toluidine blue O (TBO), and a poly-L-lysine chlorin(e6) conjugate (pL-ce6) with representative members of three classes of pathogens; Escherichia coli (gram-negative bacteria), Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive bacteria), Candida albicans (yeast). We compared fluence-dependent cell survival after illumination with the appropriate wavelengths of light before and after extracellular dye had been washed out and used three 10-fold dilutions of cell concentration. pL-ce6 was overall the most powerful photosensitizer, was equally effective with and without washing, and showed a strong dependence on cell concentration. TBO was less effective in all cases after washing, and the dependence on cell concentration was less pronounced. RB was ineffective after washing (except for S. aureus) but still showed a dependence on cell concentration. The overall order of susceptibility was S. aureus>E. coli>C. albicans, but C. albicans cells were 10 to 50 times bigger than the bacteria. We conclude that the number and mass of the cells compete both for available dye binding and for extracellularly generated reactive oxygen species.
光动力疗法涉及使用称为光敏剂的无毒染料和可见光来产生活性氧并杀死细胞。由于多重抗生素耐药性问题日益严重,它正在作为一种杀死局部感染中病原体的替代方法进行研究。尽管已经对微生物杀灭机制有了很多了解,但对于染料是否必须结合并穿透各类微生物才能在光照后产生有效杀灭作用仍存在不确定性。在本报告中,我们比较了三种抗菌光敏剂:孟加拉玫瑰红(RB)、甲苯胺蓝O(TBO)和聚-L-赖氨酸二氢卟吩(e6)共轭物(pL-ce6)与三类病原体的代表性成员的相互作用;大肠杆菌(革兰氏阴性菌)、金黄色葡萄球菌(革兰氏阳性菌)、白色念珠菌(酵母)。我们在洗去细胞外染料前后,用适当波长的光照射后比较了不同光通量下的细胞存活率,并使用了三种10倍稀释的细胞浓度。总体而言,pL-ce6是最有效的光敏剂,洗与不洗效果相同,且对细胞浓度有很强的依赖性。TBO在洗后所有情况下效果较差,对细胞浓度的依赖性不太明显。RB洗后无效(金黄色葡萄球菌除外),但仍对细胞浓度有依赖性。敏感性的总体顺序为金黄色葡萄球菌>大肠杆菌>白色念珠菌,但白色念珠菌细胞比细菌大10到50倍。我们得出结论,细胞的数量和质量在争夺可用的染料结合以及细胞外产生活性氧方面存在竞争。