Faculty of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Department of Operative Dentistry, Rua Cap. Francisco Pedro, S/N, Rodolfo Teófilo, 60430-170 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2012 Jan 5;106:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
Several photosensitizers have been used against oral bacteria without standardization. Singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) is an aggressive chemical species that can kill cells through apoptosis or necrosis.
to compare the antimicrobial activity of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with different photosensitizers at the same concentration against Streptococcus mutans. In addition, the (1)O(2) production of each photosensitizer was determined. The photosensitizers (163.5 μM) methylene blue (MB), toluidine blue ortho (TBO) and malachite green (MG) were activated with a light-emitting diode (LED; λ=636 nm), while eosin (EOS), erythrosine (ERI) and rose bengal (RB) were irradiated with a curing light (λ=570 nm). Light sources were operated at 24 J cm(-2). For each photosensitizer, 40 randomized assays (n=10 per condition) were performed under one of the following experimental conditions: no light irradiation or photosensitizer, irradiation only, photosensitizer only or irradiation in the presence of a photosensitizer. After treatment, serial dilutions of S. mutans were seeded onto brain heart infusion agar to determine viability in colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU mL(-1)). Generation of (1)O(2) was analyzed by tryptophan photooxidation, and the decay constant was estimated. Results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer test (p<0.05). PDT with irradiation in the presence of the photosensitizers TBO and MG was effective in reducing S. mutans counts by 3 and 1.4 logs, respectively (p<0.01), compared to their respective untreated controls. MB generated 1.3 times more (1)O(2) than TBO, and both produced significantly higher concentrations of singlet oxygen than the other photosensitizers. Since in vitro bulk (1)O(2) production does not indicate that (1)O(2) was generated in the bacterial activity site, the bactericidal action against S. mutans cannot be related to in vitro singlet O(2) generation rate. In vitroS. mutans-experiments demonstrated TBO as the only photosensitizer that effectively reduced 99.9% of these microorganisms.
已有多种用于口腔细菌的光敏剂,但尚未标准化。单线态氧((1)O(2))是一种具有侵略性的化学物质,可以通过细胞凋亡或坏死杀死细胞。
比较不同浓度的光动力疗法(PDT)对变形链球菌的抗菌活性。此外,还测定了每种光敏剂的(1)O(2)产量。亚甲蓝(MB)、甲苯胺蓝邻(TBO)和孔雀绿(MG)等光敏剂(163.5 μM)用发光二极管(LED;λ=636nm)激活,而曙红(EOS)、赤藓红(ERI)和玫瑰红(RB)则用固化灯(λ=570nm)照射。光源的操作功率为 24J/cm(-2)。对于每种光敏剂,在以下实验条件之一下进行 40 次随机检测(n=10 次/条件):无光照或光敏剂、仅光照、仅光敏剂或在光敏剂存在下光照。治疗后,将变形链球菌的连续稀释液接种于脑心浸液琼脂中,以确定每毫升(CFU/mL)的活菌数。通过色氨酸光氧化分析生成(1)O(2),并估算衰减常数。结果采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey-Kramer 检验(p<0.05)进行分析。与未处理对照组相比,TBO 和 MG 存在光照的 PDT 可分别使变形链球菌计数减少 3 倍和 1.4 对数(p<0.01)。MB 产生的(1)O(2)比 TBO 多 1.3 倍,且产生的单线态氧浓度均明显高于其他光敏剂。由于体外 bulk (1)O(2)产量并不能表明(1)O(2)是在细菌活性部位产生的,因此,对变形链球菌的杀菌作用不能与体外单线态氧生成速率相关。体外实验表明,TBO 是唯一能有效减少 99.9%这些微生物的光敏剂。