Suppr超能文献

外排转运体对四种喹诺酮类药物(环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、加替沙星和莫西沙星)在J774巨噬细胞中的蓄积和外排的影响。

Influence of efflux transporters on the accumulation and efflux of four quinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, garenoxacin, and moxifloxacin) in J774 macrophages.

作者信息

Michot Jean-Michel, Seral Cristina, Van Bambeke Françoise, Mingeot-Leclercq Marie-Paule, Tulkens Paul M

机构信息

Unité de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, Université catholique de Louvain, UCL 73.70 avenue E. Mounier 73, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jun;49(6):2429-37. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2429-2437.2005.

Abstract

Ciprofloxacin is subject to efflux from J774 macrophages through a multidrug resistance-related protein-like transporter (J. M. Michot, F. Van Bambeke, M. P. Mingeot-Leclercq, and P. M. Tulkens, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2673-2682, 2004). Here, we compare ciprofloxacin to levofloxacin, garenoxacin, and moxifloxacin for transport. At 4 mg/liter, an apparent steady state in accumulation was reached after 30 to 60 min for all quinolones but to quite different levels (approximately 3, 5, 10, and 16 fold). Accumulation of ciprofloxacin was increased (to about 16 to 20 fold) by ATP depletion, increase in extracellular concentration, and the addition of probenecid, gemfibrozil, or MK571 (but not verapamil or GF120918). These treatments did not affect the accumulation of moxifloxacin. Levofloxacin and garenoxacin showed an intermediate behavior. Efflux of ciprofloxacin was slowed down by probenecid (half-life, 7.2 versus 1.6 min). Moxifloxacin efflux was faster and unaffected by probenecid (half-lifes, 0.27 versus 0.33 min). Efflux of levofloxacin and garenoxacin was modestly decreased by probenecid (1.5 and 2.1 fold). Accumulation of 14C-labeled ciprofloxacin was increased by unlabeled ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin, but moxifloxacin was two times less potent. Accumulation of moxifloxacin at 4 degrees C was almost identical to that at 37 degrees C, whereas that of ciprofloxacin was minimal (levofloxacin and garenoxacin showed intermediate behaviors). Cells subjected to thermal shock (56 degrees C; 10 min) accumulated all quinolones at a similar level (16 to 23 fold). We conclude that moxifloxacin is apparently not subject to efflux from J774 macrophages, even though it can interact with the ciprofloxacin transporter. Levofloxacin and garenoxacin are partially effluxed. Data suggest that efflux plays an important role in the differential accumulation of quinolones by J774 macrophages.

摘要

环丙沙星可通过一种多药耐药相关蛋白样转运体从J774巨噬细胞中流出(J. M. 米肖、F. 范班贝克、M. P. 明热奥 - 勒克莱尔克和P. M. 图尔肯斯,《抗菌药物化疗》48:2673 - 2682,2004年)。在此,我们比较了环丙沙星与左氧氟沙星、加替沙星和莫西沙星的转运情况。在4毫克/升时,所有喹诺酮类药物在30至60分钟后均达到明显的积累稳态,但积累水平差异很大(约为3、5、10和16倍)。ATP耗竭、细胞外浓度增加以及加入丙磺舒、吉非贝齐或MK571(但维拉帕米或GF120918无效)可使环丙沙星的积累增加(至约16至20倍)。这些处理不影响莫西沙星的积累。左氧氟沙星和加替沙星表现出中间行为。丙磺舒减缓了环丙沙星的流出(半衰期,7.2分钟对1.6分钟)。莫西沙星流出更快且不受丙磺舒影响(半衰期,0.27分钟对0.33分钟)。丙磺舒适度降低了左氧氟沙星和加替沙星的流出(1.5倍和2.1倍)。未标记的环丙沙星和莫西沙星可增加14C标记的环丙沙星的积累,但莫西沙星的效力低两倍。4℃时莫西沙星的积累与37℃时几乎相同,而环丙沙星的积累极少(左氧氟沙星和加替沙星表现出中间行为)。经热休克(56℃;10分钟)处理的细胞对所有喹诺酮类药物的积累水平相似(16至23倍)。我们得出结论,莫西沙星显然不会从J774巨噬细胞中流出,尽管它可与环丙沙星转运体相互作用。左氧氟沙星和加替沙星部分流出。数据表明,流出在J774巨噬细胞对喹诺酮类药物的差异积累中起重要作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Intracellular pharmacodynamics of antibiotics.抗生素的细胞内药效学
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2003 Sep;17(3):615-34. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(03)00066-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验