Morel M, Boutry N, Demondion X, Legroux-Gerot I, Cotten H, Cotten A
Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Boulevard du Professeur Jules Leclercq, 59037 Lille Cédex, France.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2005 Aug;27(3):176-83. doi: 10.1007/s00276-004-0311-6. Epub 2005 May 26.
The purpose of this study was first to determine the normal blood supply of the heel entheses with cadaver injection, and second, to identify by means of ultrasound (US) this blood supply in healthy volunteers before and after the intravenous injection of a US contrast agent (SonoVue). Twenty cadaver lower limbs were cut into sagittal, coronal, or axial sections after the injection of a red-colored gelatin solution. Ten anatomical samples were selected for histology. Then 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled in a contrast-enhanced ultrasonography study (CUS). Calcaneal tendon and plantar aponeurosis entheses were studied first without any contrast-agent (B-mode, power Doppler). A single dose (2.4 ml) of the contrast agent was then administered for studying each enthesis of the right foot. The operators had to look for blood flow within the entheses and in the adjacent soft tissues. Anastomotic transverse branches were seen macroscopically at the back of the calcaneal tendon, giving some capillaries penetrating the enthesis. None of these vessels could be seen with CUS. In contrast, a high-density vascular network could be detected in Kager's triangle with CUS. No blood vessel could be seen within the plantar aponeurosis enthesis, either macroscopically or microscopically. No evidence of entheseal vascularization was found with any contrast-enhanced imaging technique. Inferior branches of the lateral plantar artery were seen on coronal and sagittal sections of the hindfoot, and could be detected with CUS. These arterioles were running toward the anterior aspect of the calcaneal tuberosity, near the plantar aponeurosis insertion. In conclusion, no vascularization was detected with CUS at the cortical bone insertion of normal heel entheses. However, some vascularization could be seen in the immediate vicinity of heel entheses. The latter feature has to be kept in mind, as it may represent a pitfall for the diagnosis of early inflammatory changes in patients, especially those with seronegative spondylarthropathies.
本研究的目的,一是通过尸体注射确定足跟附着点的正常血供,二是在健康志愿者静脉注射超声造影剂(声诺维)前后,利用超声(US)识别这种血供情况。在注射红色明胶溶液后,将20条尸体下肢切成矢状、冠状或轴状切片。选取10个解剖样本进行组织学检查。然后,10名健康志愿者参与了一项超声造影研究(CUS)。首先在不使用任何造影剂的情况下(B超、能量多普勒)研究跟腱和足底腱膜附着点。然后给予单剂量(2.4毫升)的造影剂,用于研究右脚的每个附着点。操作人员必须寻找附着点内及相邻软组织内的血流情况。在跟腱后方肉眼可见吻合的横向分支,有一些毛细血管穿透附着点。CUS未发现这些血管。相比之下,CUS可在Kager三角区检测到高密度血管网络。在足底腱膜附着点内,无论是肉眼还是显微镜下均未发现血管。任何造影增强成像技术均未发现附着点血管化的证据。在后足的冠状和矢状切片上可见足底外侧动脉的下分支,CUS也可检测到。这些小动脉朝向跟骨结节的前方,靠近足底腱膜附着处。总之,CUS未在正常足跟附着点的皮质骨附着处检测到血管化。然而,在足跟附着点附近可看到一些血管化情况。必须牢记这一特征,因为它可能是诊断患者早期炎症变化的一个陷阱,尤其是血清阴性脊柱关节病患者。