Fung Donald, Cohen Marsha M, Stewart Susan, Davies Andy
*North Bay General Hospital, North Bay, and Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto; †Centre for Research in Women's Health, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre and the Department of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto; and ‡North Shores District Health Council, North Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1644-1650. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154206.81132.B9.
The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) is a reliable and valid tool to measure patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care. We used the ISAS to discover determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation in a small community hospital. The ISAS (scored 1 to 6) was administered to 306 patients immediately after cataract surgery. All patients received topical local anesthesia and IV sedation administered by an anesthesiologist. Patient satisfaction was high: mean ISAS was 5.6 (sd 0.46; range: 3.3-6.0). The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative pain was 13% and 37%; other adverse events were infrequent (<5%). In multivariable logistic regression, significant predictors of satisfaction were postoperative pain (odds ratio [OR]: 4.84; 99% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21, 10.60), surgeon (OR: 0.21; 99% CI: 0.05, 0.91), and preoperative anxiety (OR: 1.17; 99% CI: 1.03, 1.34). ISAS mean scores (OR = 0.28; 99% CI: 0.13, 0.59) and preoperative anxiety (OR = 1.12; 99% CI: 0.99, 1.28) emerged as significant predictors of low rating of quality of experience. Our results indicate that the ISAS can be used to track patient satisfaction with monitored cataract care. Pain during and after cataract surgery is common and is a major reason for lower patient satisfaction with their cataract care.
爱荷华麻醉满意度量表(ISAS)是一种可靠且有效的工具,用于衡量患者对麻醉监护的满意度。我们使用ISAS来探寻在一家小型社区医院中,局部表面麻醉和镇静监测下白内障手术患者满意度的决定因素。白内障手术后,立即对306名患者进行了ISAS评分(1至6分)。所有患者均接受了由麻醉医生实施的局部表面麻醉和静脉镇静。患者满意度较高:ISAS平均分为5.6(标准差0.46;范围:3.3 - 6.0)。术中及术后疼痛发生率分别为13%和37%;其他不良事件较少(<5%)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,满意度的显著预测因素为术后疼痛(优势比[OR]:4.84;99%置信区间[CI]:2.21, 10.60)、外科医生(OR:0.21;99% CI:0.05, 0.91)以及术前焦虑(OR:1.17;99% CI:1.03, 1.34)。ISAS平均得分(OR = 0.28;99% CI:0.13, 0.59)和术前焦虑(OR = 1.12;99% CI:0.99, 1.28)是体验质量评分较低的显著预测因素。我们的结果表明,ISAS可用于追踪患者对白内障监护的满意度。白内障手术期间及术后的疼痛很常见,是患者对白内障护理满意度较低的主要原因。