Suppr超能文献

比较表面麻醉联合球后阻滞与静脉镇静对白内障手术(超声乳化法)患者血流动力学变化及满意度的影响。

Comparing the effect of topical anesthesia and retrobulbar block with intravenous sedation on hemodynamic changes and satisfaction in patients undergoing cataract surgery (phaco method).

作者信息

Haddadi Soudabeh, Marzban Shideh, Fazeli Baharak, Heidarzadeh Abtin, Parvizi Arman, Naderinabi Bahram, Panjtan Panah Mohamad Reza

机构信息

Anesthesiology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Apr 28;5(2):e24780. doi: 10.5812/aapm.24780. eCollection 2015 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cataract is one of the most common surgical procedures in the elderly. In most cases, the elderly have cardiac ischemia or chronic coronary diseases, which would lead to more ischemic events during general anesthesia. Therefore, surgeons and anesthetists prefer regional aesthesia to the general one owing to its more advantages and less complications.

OBJECTIVES

Therefore, this study aimed to compare topical method and retrobulbar block for pain intensity, patient's satisfaction, hemodynamic changes and intra and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a single-blinded clinical trial, 114 patients scheduled for cataract surgery, aged 50 to 90 years with ASA physical status of I-III, were randomly assigned to two groups under monitored anesthesia care as topical anesthesia and retrobulbar block. After the injection of intravenous sedation, which was the combination of midazolam 0.5-1 mg with fentanyl 0.5-1 µ/kg, patients received retro bulbar block or topical anesthesia. During the operation, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and arterial saturation of O2were measured every five minutes. In addition, pain (VAS) and satisfaction (ISAS) scores were recorded every 15 minutes, then at recovery and one hour after the ending of operation in the ward. Findings were statistically analyzed using SPSS 16.

RESULTS

In this study, no significant association was found between age, gender, education and physical condition of patients in both topical and retro bulbar block groups. Comparison of pain based on VAS, satisfaction based on ISAS score and MAP in the studied periods had no significant differences between the two groups of patients undergoing cataract surgery. However, significant differences were found between the two groups (P = 0.045, 0.02, 0.042 and P < 0.05) regarding heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation percentage after 20-30 minutes of the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods, topical and retro bulbar block had similar impression in cataract surgery regarding analgesia and patient satisfaction. However, in non-complicated cataract surgeries with short duration, topical anesthesia may be the preferable method, because of non-invasiveness, appropriate analgesia, patient satisfaction and hemodynamic stability.

摘要

背景

白内障手术是老年人最常见的外科手术之一。在大多数情况下,老年人患有心脏缺血或慢性冠状动脉疾病,这会导致全身麻醉期间更多的缺血事件。因此,由于区域麻醉具有更多优势且并发症更少,外科医生和麻醉师更倾向于采用区域麻醉而非全身麻醉。

目的

因此,本研究旨在比较表面麻醉法和球后阻滞在疼痛强度、患者满意度、血流动力学变化以及术中及术后并发症方面的差异。

患者与方法

在一项单盲临床试验中,将114例计划行白内障手术、年龄在50至90岁、ASA身体状况为I - III级的患者,在麻醉监护下随机分为表面麻醉组和球后阻滞组。静脉注射由咪达唑仑0.5 - 1mg与芬太尼0.5 - 1μg/kg组成的镇静剂后,患者接受球后阻滞或表面麻醉。手术过程中,每五分钟测量一次心率、收缩压和舒张压、平均动脉压以及动脉血氧饱和度。此外,每15分钟记录一次疼痛(视觉模拟评分法[VAS])和满意度(患者满意度评分[ISAS]),然后在恢复阶段以及术后在病房一小时后进行记录。使用SPSS 16对结果进行统计学分析。

结果

在本研究中,表面麻醉组和球后阻滞组患者的年龄、性别、教育程度和身体状况之间未发现显著关联。基于VAS的疼痛比较、基于ISAS评分的满意度比较以及研究期间的平均动脉压在两组白内障手术患者之间无显著差异。然而,在手术20 - 30分钟后,两组在心率、收缩压和舒张压以及动脉血氧饱和度百分比方面存在显著差异(P = 0.045、0.02、0.042且P < 0.05)。

结论

表面麻醉和球后阻滞这两种方法在白内障手术的镇痛效果和患者满意度方面具有相似的表现。然而,在非复杂且持续时间短的白内障手术中,表面麻醉可能是更可取的方法,因为它无创、镇痛效果良好、患者满意度高且血流动力学稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2da/4377165/81cf36eebac6/aapm-05-02-24780-i001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验