Reistetter Timothy A, Spencer Jean C, Trujillo Leonard, Abreu Beatriz C
School of Occupational Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX, USA.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2005;20(2):139-48.
To examine instrument reliability, validity, factor structure, and conceptual underpinnings of the Community Integration Measure (CIM) with the Community Integration Questionnaire Revised (CIQ-R) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS).
A replication study.
Community living.
Ninety-one participants: 51 individuals with a brain injury, and 40 without brain injury.
Internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, discriminant validity factor structure.
CIM items produced standardized alphas ranging from 0.72 to 0.83. Significant positive correlations were found among the CIM and both the CIQ-R and SWLS, with the CIM performing better with the SWLS than did the CIQ-R. The CIM discriminated between subject samples as well as by living arrangement. The factor loading solution revealed a three-factor model that explained 63.72 percent of the variance.
The CIM shows good promise for capturing an individual's perception of community integration. The factor structure supports the original Model of Community Integration. Further research is needed to examine the influence of objective items on the CIM and Model of Community Integration.
运用修订后的社区融合问卷(CIQ-R)和生活满意度量表(SWLS)检验社区融合测量量表(CIM)的信度、效度、因子结构和概念基础。
一项重复研究。
社区生活环境。
91名参与者,其中51名脑损伤个体,40名无脑损伤个体。
内部一致性、效标效度、结构效度、区分效度、因子结构。
CIM各条目产生的标准化α系数范围为0.72至0.83。CIM与CIQ-R和SWLS之间均存在显著正相关,CIM与SWLS的相关性优于与CIQ-R的相关性。CIM能够区分不同的受试者样本以及居住安排。因子负荷解显示出一个三因子模型,该模型解释了63.72%的方差。
CIM在获取个体对社区融合的感知方面显示出良好前景。因子结构支持最初的社区融合模型。需要进一步研究以检验客观条目对CIM和社区融合模型的影响。