Suppr超能文献

是时候停止颈椎功能预操作测试了吗?

Is it time to stop functional pre-manipulation testing of the cervical spine?

作者信息

Thiel Haymo, Rix George

机构信息

Anglo-European College of Chiropractic, 13-15 Parkwood Road, Bournemouth BH5 2DF, UK.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2005 May;10(2):154-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.06.004. Epub 2004 Oct 5.

Abstract

The combined extended and rotated cervical spine position has been postulated to affect vertebral artery blood flow by primarily causing a narrowing of the vessel lumen, usually within the artery contralateral to the side of head rotation. The production of brainstem symptoms during the manoeuvre has generally been considered to be a positive test result. As a consequence, functional pre-manipulation testing of the cervical spine has been part of clinical screening undertaken by chiropractors and other manual practitioners to rule out the risk of possible injury to the vertebral artery. To date, these testing procedures are taught to students and carried out in daily clinical practice, despite the considerable controversy that exists about their validity. This paper considers and discusses the usefulness of functional pre-manipulation testing for clinical scenarios, involving dissection, spasm or stenosis of the vertebral artery, and makes the following recommendations: (1) Practitioners must assess the patient thoroughly, through careful history taking and physical examination, for the possibility of vertebral artery dissection. It is important to note that vertebral artery dissection (VAD) may present as pain only, and may not be associated with symptoms and signs of brainstem ischaemia. (2) If there is a strong likelihood of VAD, provocative pre-manipulation tests should not be performed, and the patient must be referred appropriately. (3) In the patient presenting with symptoms of brainstem ischaemia due to non-dissection stenotic vertebral artery pathologies, provocative testing is very unlikely to provide any useful additional diagnostic information. (4) In the patient with unapparent vertebral artery pathology, where spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is considered as the treatment of choice, provocative testing is very unlikely to provide any useful information in assessing the probability of manipulation induced vertebral artery injury.

摘要

颈椎伸展并旋转的联合姿势被认为主要通过导致血管腔狭窄来影响椎动脉血流,这种狭窄通常发生在头部旋转一侧对侧的动脉内。在该动作过程中出现脑干症状一般被视为阳性测试结果。因此,颈椎功能操作前测试一直是脊椎按摩师和其他手法治疗从业者进行临床筛查的一部分,以排除椎动脉可能受伤的风险。迄今为止,尽管这些测试程序的有效性存在很大争议,但仍在教授给学生并在日常临床实践中进行。本文考虑并讨论了功能操作前测试在涉及椎动脉夹层、痉挛或狭窄的临床场景中的实用性,并提出以下建议:(1)从业者必须通过仔细询问病史和体格检查,全面评估患者是否存在椎动脉夹层的可能性。需要注意的是,椎动脉夹层(VAD)可能仅表现为疼痛,且可能与脑干缺血的症状和体征无关。(2)如果VAD可能性很大,则不应进行激发性操作前测试,必须将患者适当转诊。(3)对于因非夹层狭窄性椎动脉病变而出现脑干缺血症状的患者,激发性测试极不可能提供任何有用的额外诊断信息。(4)对于椎动脉病变不明显且脊柱手法治疗(SMT)被视为首选治疗方法的患者,激发性测试在评估手法引起椎动脉损伤的可能性方面极不可能提供任何有用信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验