直肠指检是基于人群的前列腺癌筛查的障碍。
Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
作者信息
Nagler Harris M, Gerber Eric W, Homel Peter, Wagner Joseph R, Norton Jennifer, Lebovitch Steven, Phillips John L
机构信息
Department of Urology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York 10010, USA.
出版信息
Urology. 2005 Jun;65(6):1137-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.021.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether use of the digital rectal examination (DRE) results in decreased participation in prostate cancer (PCa) screening, which, in turn, would result in lower detection. Population-based PCa screening includes prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement with or without a DRE. PSA and DRE screening provide greater sensitivity than PSA alone; however, the increased participation rate resulting from PSA-alone screening may result in a greater detection rate.
METHODS
We performed a survey of 13,580 healthy men undergoing PSA-only population-based screening. In addition to the basic demographic information, the survey asked whether the participant would still be willing to participate in the screening if it included a DRE. We modeled the willingness to participate to assess the effect of PSA screening versus PSA and DRE screening on the basis of previously published data and our results.
RESULTS
The results of our study indicated that only 78% of men would participate in screening that included both DRE and PSA. Thus, 7800 men of a theoretical population of 10,000 would participate in a screening that included both DRE and PSA. The positive screen rate (PSA > or = 4.0 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE) would then have been 2013, with 472 PCa cases and 1540 negative biopsies. In the PSA-alone arm, all 10,000 men would have agreed to participate, and the positive screen rate (PSA > or = 4.0 ng/mL) would have been 1480, with 499 PCa cases and 980 negative biopsies. The PSA-alone arm would thus have detected 27 more cancers and performed 560 fewer negative biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our study have demonstrated that DRE is a significant barrier to participation in PCa screening. PSA plus DRE-based programs result in fewer cases of PCa detected, with a significant increase in negative biopsies. We, therefore, suggest that future mass screening efforts include only PSA determination and omit the DRE.
目的
确定直肠指检(DRE)的使用是否会导致前列腺癌(PCa)筛查参与率降低,进而导致更低的检出率。基于人群的PCa筛查包括单独进行或联合直肠指检的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测。PSA和DRE筛查比单独PSA筛查具有更高的敏感性;然而,单独PSA筛查导致的参与率增加可能会带来更高的检出率。
方法
我们对13580名仅接受基于人群的PSA筛查的健康男性进行了一项调查。除基本人口统计学信息外,调查询问参与者如果筛查包括直肠指检是否仍愿意参与。我们根据先前发表的数据和我们的研究结果,对参与意愿进行建模,以评估PSA筛查与PSA联合DRE筛查的效果。
结果
我们的研究结果表明,只有78%的男性愿意参与同时包括DRE和PSA的筛查。因此,在理论上的10000名男性人群中,7800名男性会参与同时包括DRE和PSA的筛查。阳性筛查率(PSA≥4.0 ng/mL和/或DRE异常)将为2013,其中472例为PCa病例,1540例活检为阴性。在仅PSA组中,所有10000名男性都会同意参与,阳性筛查率(PSA≥4.0 ng/mL)将为1480,其中499例为PCa病例,980例活检为阴性。仅PSA组因此会多检测出27例癌症,且阴性活检减少560例。
结论
我们的研究结果表明,直肠指检是参与PCa筛查的一个重大障碍。基于PSA加DRE的筛查方案导致检测出的PCa病例减少,阴性活检显著增加。因此,我们建议未来的大规模筛查工作仅包括PSA测定,省略直肠指检。