• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比利时临床伦理学与医疗保健伦理委员会的现状

The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium.

作者信息

Meulenbergs T, Vermylen J, Schotsmans P T

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2005 Jun;31(6):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006924.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2003.006924
PMID:15923477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1734169/
Abstract

Ethics committees are the most important practical instrument of clinical ethics in Belgium and fulfil three tasks: the ethical review of experimental protocols, advising on the ethical aspects of healthcare practice, and ethics consultation. In this article the authors examine the current situation of ethics committees in Belgium from the perspective of clinical ethics. Firstly, the most important steps which thus far have been taken in Belgium are examined. Secondly, recent opinion by the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics with regard to ethics committees is presented and the activities of Belgian ethics committees are discussed. Finally, the option to bring research ethics and clinical ethics under the roof of just one committee is criticised using a pragmatic and a methodological argument. Concomitantly, the authors build an argument in favour of the further development of ethics consultation.

摘要

伦理委员会是比利时临床伦理最重要的实践工具,履行三项任务:对实验方案进行伦理审查、就医疗实践的伦理方面提供建议以及进行伦理咨询。在本文中,作者从临床伦理的角度审视了比利时伦理委员会的现状。首先,考察了比利时迄今为止采取的最重要步骤。其次,介绍了比利时生物伦理咨询委员会对伦理委员会的最新意见,并讨论了比利时伦理委员会的活动。最后,从务实和方法论的角度批评了将研究伦理和临床伦理置于同一个委员会之下的选择。与此同时,作者提出了支持进一步发展伦理咨询的理由。

相似文献

1
The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium.比利时临床伦理学与医疗保健伦理委员会的现状
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jun;31(6):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006924.
2
The bioethics movement and hospital ethics committees.生物伦理学运动与医院伦理委员会。
MD Law Rev. 1991;50(3):859-94.
3
Medical ethics.医学伦理学
JAMA. 1984 Oct 26;252(16):2296-300.
4
A national ethics committee.一个国家伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1988;297(6664):1626-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6664.1626.
5
Debating euthanasia in Belgium.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Sep-Oct;27(5):46-7.
6
[Euthanasia, four propositions of the Consultant Committee on Bioethics].
Rev Med Brux. 1998 Sep;19(4):A312-3.
7
Biomedical ethics committees.生物医学伦理委员会
Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):327-41.
8
National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research.国家独立监督:加强人体研究受试者的安全保障
Account Res. 1999;7(2-4):303-9. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573961.
9
Biomedical ethics in the Federal Republic of Germany (F.R.G.).
Theor Med. 1988 Oct;9(3):287-97. doi: 10.1007/BF00489703.
10
Clinical Bioethics Committees: a Brazilian experience.临床生物伦理委员会:巴西的经验
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):181-92, 207. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0181.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.评估临床伦理委员会的有效性:系统评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09986-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
2
Hospital/clinical ethics committees' notion: an overview.医院/临床伦理委员会的概念:概述
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016 Dec 18;9:17. eCollection 2016.
3
Written institutional ethics policies on euthanasia: an empirical-based organizational-ethical framework.关于安乐死的书面机构伦理政策:一个基于实证的组织伦理框架。
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 May;17(2):215-28. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9524-y.
4
Quality in ethics consultations.伦理咨询的质量。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):761-74. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9489-x.
5
What and who are clinical ethics committees for?临床伦理委员会是为了什么以及为了谁而设立的?
J Med Ethics. 2007 Sep;33(9):497-500. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021394.
6
Regulation of healthcare ethics committees in Europe.欧洲医疗伦理委员会的监管
Med Health Care Philos. 2007 Dec;10(4):461-75. doi: 10.1007/s11019-007-9054-6. Epub 2007 May 23.
7
Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors.临床实践中的伦理困境:欧洲医生的经历。
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jan;33(1):51-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014266.
8
Hospital based ethics, current situation in France: between "Espaces" and committees.基于医院的伦理,法国的现状:介于“空间”与委员会之间。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Sep;32(9):503-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.015271.

本文引用的文献

1
European experiences of ethics committees.欧洲伦理委员会的经验。
Nurs Ethics. 2001 Mar;8(2):142-51. doi: 10.1177/096973300100800207.
2
Law-making, ethics and hastiness: the debate on euthanasia in Belgium.立法、伦理与仓促:比利时关于安乐死的辩论
Ethical Perspect. 2002;9(2-3):86-95. doi: 10.2143/ep.9.2.503848.
3
On the current state of clinical ethics.论临床伦理学的现状。
Pain Med. 2001 Jun;2(2):97-105. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2001.002002097.x.
4
Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.伦理咨询对重症监护环境中无意义生命维持治疗的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1166-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.9.1166.
5
Clinical ethics committees: clinician support or crisis management?临床伦理委员会:临床医生支持还是危机管理?
HEC Forum. 2002 Mar;14(1):13-25. doi: 10.1023/a:1020965130205.
6
Ethics consultation as moral engagement.作为道德参与的伦理咨询
Bioethics. 1991 Jan;5(1):44-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00143.x.
7
Research ethics committees: a regional approach.研究伦理委员会:一种区域性方法。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Apr;20(2):161-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1009989104496.
8
Clinical medical ethics.临床医疗伦理学
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Spring;1(1):5-9.