临床伦理委员会是为了什么以及为了谁而设立的？
What and who are clinical ethics committees for?
作者信息
McLean Sheila A M
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2007 Sep;33(9):497-500. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021394.
Abstract
As support for clinical ethics committees in the UK grows, care must be taken to define their function, membership and method of working and the status of their decisions.
摘要
随着英国对临床伦理委员会的支持不断增加，必须注意明确其职能、成员构成、工作方法以及其决定的地位。
相似文献
1
What and who are clinical ethics committees for?临床伦理委员会是为了什么以及为了谁而设立的？
J Med Ethics. 2007 Sep;33(9):497-500. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021394.
2
Ethics corner: cases from the Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for aged-friends.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;4(2):109-11. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000053510.89370.E4.
3
[Legal repercussions of Clinical Ethics Committees reports].[临床伦理委员会报告的法律影响]
Rev Med Chil. 2006 Apr;134(4):517-9. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872006000400016. Epub 2006 May 25.
4
Comments on the cases of Ms. S. And Ms. B.关于S女士和B女士病例的评论
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;4(2):112. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000053425.70257.06.
5
Clinical ethics committees in the UK.英国的临床伦理委员会。
Bull Med Ethics. 2002 May(178):13-5.
6
A national study of ethics committees.一项关于伦理委员会的全国性研究。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Fall;1(4):60-4. doi: 10.1162/152651601317139531.
7
Ethics of caesarean section in the USA.美国剖宫产的伦理学问题。
Midwifery. 2004 Mar;20(1):118.
8
The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees.生物伦理学辩论的质量：对临床伦理委员会的影响
J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):357-60. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021634.
9
Hospital ethics committees as the forum of last resort: an idea whose time has not come.
North Carol Law Rev. 1998 Jan;76(2):353-406.
10
Ethics support in clinical practice.临床实践中的伦理支持。
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Sep;90(9):943-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.062752.
引用本文的文献
1
The 'Institutional Lottery': Institutional variation in the processes involved in accessing late abortion in Victoria, Australia.“机构抽签”：澳大利亚维多利亚州晚期堕胎获取过程中的机构差异
Womens Stud Int Forum. 2023 Nov-Dec;101:102822. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102822.
2
Ethical issues in oncology practice: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences and expectations.肿瘤学实践中的伦理问题：利益相关者的经验和期望的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jun 30;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00803-x.
3
Patient participation in Dutch ethics support: practice, ideals, challenges and recommendations-a national survey.患者参与荷兰伦理支持：实践、理想、挑战和建议——一项全国性调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jun 22;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00801-z.
4
COVID-19 underscores the important role of Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa.新冠疫情凸显了临床伦理委员会在非洲的重要作用。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00696-2.
5
Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to Critical Incident Reporting Systems.通过将伦理维度纳入重大事件报告系统来提高患者安全。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 8;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8.
6
The role of hospital ethics committees in emergency medicine practice.医院伦理委员会在急诊医学实践中的作用。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jul 3;1(4):403-407. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12136. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review.人工智能在医学教育中的应用与挑战：综合综述
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Jun 15;5(1):e13930. doi: 10.2196/13930.
8
Falling on deaf ears: a qualitative study on clinical ethical committees in France.充耳不闻：法国临床伦理委员会的定性研究
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Dec;22(4):515-529. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09907-5.
9
Clinicians' perspectives of parental decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: a qualitative study.临床医生对严重先天性异常诊断后父母决策的看法：一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014716.
10
A Child as a Donor for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Bioethical Justification-A Case Study on Sickle Cell Disease.儿童作为造血干细胞移植的供体：生物伦理学依据——以镰状细胞病为例的案例研究
Case Rep Hematol. 2017;2017:8394732. doi: 10.1155/2017/8394732. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors.临床实践中的伦理困境：欧洲医生的经历。
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jan;33(1):51-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014266.
2
The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium.比利时临床伦理学与医疗保健伦理委员会的现状
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jun;31(6):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006924.
3
How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis.医生如何面对伦理困境：一项定性分析。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan;31(1):7-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.005835.
4
Development of clinical ethics committees.临床伦理委员会的发展。
BMJ. 2004 Apr 17;328(7445):950-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7445.950.
5
Ethics committees and due process: nesting rights in a community of caring.伦理委员会与正当程序：在关爱社区中嵌套权利
MD Law Rev. 1991;50(3):798-858.
6
Legal aspects of clinical ethics committees.临床伦理委员会的法律问题。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i50.
7
Clinical ethics committees and the formulation of health care policy.临床伦理委员会与医疗保健政策的制定
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i44-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i44.
8
Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK.英国的临床伦理支持服务：对英国目前向医疗专业人员提供伦理支持情况的调查。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i2.
9
Clinical ethics committees.临床伦理委员会
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):649-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.649.
10
Due process in ethics committee case review.伦理委员会病例审查中的正当程序。
HEC Forum. 1992;4(2):83-96. doi: 10.1007/BF00058011.
Zotero 插件