Cash A C, Whitfield C W, Ismail N, Robinson G E
Program in Ecology and Evolution, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Genes Brain Behav. 2005 Jun;4(4):267-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00131.x.
Transcription is slow relative to many post-transcriptional processes in the brain. Using the rich system of division of labor in the honeybee (Apis mellifera), we found extreme differences in the extent to which behavioral occupations of different durations were associated with gene-expression differences in the brain. Nursing and foraging, occupations lasting > 1 week, were associated with significant expression differences for nearly one-quarter of the genes tested (1208 of 5563 cDNAs tested; P < 0.01, anova), consistent with previous results. In contrast, transitional occupations, performed for 1-2 days after nursing and before the onset of foraging, were associated with either no differences (guards vs. undertakers; 19 cDNAs, fewer than the expectation of 56 false-positives) or few differences (comb builders vs. guards and undertakers; 248 cDNAs), but extensive differences relative to both nursing and foraging (> 500 cDNAs, all contrasts). Statistical power analysis indicated that expression differences of two-, 1.5- and 1.25-fold should have been detected in 100, 92 and 37% of cases, respectively. Replication of previous results at these magnitudes was 95, 71 and 51%, with no genes showing differences in the opposite direction. These results indicate that behavioral plasticity over different time-scales may be associated with substantial differences in the extent of genomic plasticity in the brain.
相对于大脑中的许多转录后过程,转录速度较慢。利用蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)丰富的分工系统,我们发现不同持续时间的行为活动与大脑基因表达差异之间的关联程度存在极大差异。护理和觅食这两种持续时间超过1周的活动,与近四分之一的测试基因(5563个cDNA中的1208个;P < 0.01,方差分析)的显著表达差异相关,这与之前的结果一致。相比之下,过渡性活动在护理后1 - 2天进行,在觅食开始前,要么与无差异相关(守卫与殡仪员;19个cDNA,少于预期的56个假阳性),要么差异较少(筑巢工与守卫和殡仪员;248个cDNA),但相对于护理和觅食两者都有广泛差异(> 500个cDNA,所有对比)。统计功效分析表明,分别在100%、92%和37%的情况下应能检测到2倍、1.5倍和1.25倍的表达差异。在这些幅度上对先前结果的重复率分别为95%、71%和51%,没有基因显示出相反方向的差异。这些结果表明,不同时间尺度上的行为可塑性可能与大脑中基因组可塑性程度的显著差异相关。