Suppr超能文献

射频消融术与抗心律失常药物作为症状性心房颤动一线治疗方法的比较:一项随机试验

Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Wazni Oussama M, Marrouche Nassir F, Martin David O, Verma Atul, Bhargava Mandeep, Saliba Walid, Bash Dianna, Schweikert Robert, Brachmann Johannes, Gunther Jens, Gutleben Klaus, Pisano Ennio, Potenza Dominico, Fanelli Raffaele, Raviele Antonio, Themistoclakis Sakis, Rossillo Antonio, Bonso Aldo, Natale Andrea

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2634-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2634.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulation is considered first-line therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency ablation may cure AF, obviating the need for antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether PVI is feasible as first-line therapy for treating patients with symptomatic AF.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter prospective randomized study conducted from December 31, 2001, to July 1, 2002, of 70 patients aged 18 to 75 years who experienced monthly symptomatic AF episodes for at least 3 months and had not been treated with antiarrhythmic drugs.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to receive either PVI using radiofrequency ablation (n=33) or antiarrhythmic drug treatment (n=37), with a 1-year follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Recurrence of AF, hospitalization, and quality of life assessment.

RESULTS

Two patients in the antiarrhythmic drug treatment group and 1 patient in the PVI group were lost to follow-up. At the end of 1-year follow-up, 22 (63%) of 35 patients who received antiarrhythmic drugs had at least 1 recurrence of symptomatic AF compared with 4 (13%) of 32 patients who received PVI (P<.001). Hospitalization during 1-year follow-up occurred in 19 (54%) of 35 patients in the antiarrhythmic drug group compared with 3 (9%) of 32 in the PVI group (P<.001). In the antiarrhythmic drug group, the mean (SD) number of AF episodes decreased from 12 (7) to 6 (4), after initiating therapy (P = .01). At 6-month follow-up, the improvement in quality of life of patients in the PVI group was significantly better than the improvement in the antiarrhythmic drug group in 5 subclasses of the Short-Form 36 health survey. There were no thromboembolic events in either group. Asymptomatic mild or moderate pulmonary vein stenosis was documented in 2 (6%) of 32 patients in the PVI group.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary vein isolation appears to be a feasible first-line approach for treating patients with symptomatic AF. Larger studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy.

摘要

背景

抗心律失常药物治疗和抗凝治疗被认为是症状性心房颤动(AF)患者的一线治疗方法。射频消融肺静脉隔离术(PVI)可能治愈房颤,从而无需使用抗心律失常药物和进行抗凝治疗。

目的

确定PVI作为症状性AF患者一线治疗方法是否可行。

设计、地点和参与者:一项多中心前瞻性随机研究,于2001年12月31日至2002年7月1日进行,纳入70例年龄在18至75岁之间、每月有症状性AF发作至少3个月且未接受过抗心律失常药物治疗的患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分为接受射频消融PVI治疗组(n = 33)或抗心律失常药物治疗组(n = 37),随访1年。

主要观察指标

房颤复发、住院情况及生活质量评估。

结果

抗心律失常药物治疗组有2例患者和PVI组有1例患者失访。在1年随访结束时,接受抗心律失常药物治疗的35例患者中有22例(63%)至少有1次症状性AF复发,而接受PVI治疗的32例患者中有4例(13%)复发(P <.001)。抗心律失常药物组35例患者中有19例(54%)在1年随访期间住院,而PVI组32例患者中有3例(9%)住院(P <.001)。在抗心律失常药物组中,开始治疗后AF发作的平均(标准差)次数从12次(7次)降至6次(4次)(P = .01)。在6个月随访时,PVI组患者在简短健康调查问卷36项的5个亚类中的生活质量改善明显优于抗心律失常药物组。两组均未发生血栓栓塞事件。PVI组32例患者中有2例(6%)记录到无症状的轻度或中度肺静脉狭窄。

结论

肺静脉隔离术似乎是治疗症状性AF患者的一种可行的一线治疗方法。需要更大规模的研究来证实其安全性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验