Gil K M, Abrams M R, Phillips G, Williams D A
Pain Management Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Apr;60(2):267-73. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.60.2.267.
This study examined 9-month follow-up data obtained from adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) participating in a longitudinal study of pain-coping strategies. Of 99 subjects completing the baseline assessment of pain-coping strategies, 89 (90%) completed a structured pain interview assessing health care use and activity reduction during painful episodes over the follow-up period. Regression analyses controlling for demographics and disease severity revealed that baseline Negative Thinking and Passive Adherence was associated with greater activity reduction and more frequent health care contacts during the subsequent 9 months. Additional correlational analyses revealed that if levels of Negative Thinking and Passive Adherence increased from baseline to follow-up, this increase was associated with even further reductions in activity level during painful episodes. Changes in disease severity were not associated with any of the follow-up measures. Comparing pain-coping strategies assessed at baseline to pain-coping strategies measured at follow-up revealed that, without intervention, pain-coping strategies were relatively stable over time.
本研究检查了参与疼痛应对策略纵向研究的镰状细胞病(SCD)成人患者的9个月随访数据。在99名完成疼痛应对策略基线评估的受试者中,89名(90%)完成了一项结构化疼痛访谈,评估随访期间疼痛发作时的医疗保健使用情况和活动减少情况。控制人口统计学和疾病严重程度的回归分析显示,基线时的消极思维和被动依从性与随后9个月内更大程度的活动减少以及更频繁的医疗保健接触相关。额外的相关性分析表明,如果消极思维和被动依从性水平从基线到随访有所增加,这种增加与疼痛发作期间活动水平的进一步降低相关。疾病严重程度的变化与任何一项随访指标均无关联。将基线时评估的疼痛应对策略与随访时测量的疼痛应对策略进行比较发现,未经干预的情况下,疼痛应对策略随时间相对稳定。