McCormick David P, Chonmaitree Tasnee, Pittman Carmen, Saeed Kokab, Friedman Norman R, Uchida Tatsuo, Baldwin Constance D
Division of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-1119, USA.
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1455-65. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1665.
The widespread use of antibiotics for treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) has resulted in the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens that are difficult to treat. However, it has been shown that most children with nonsevere AOM recover without ABX. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, acceptability, and costs of a non-ABX intervention for children with nonsevere AOM.
Children 6 months to 12 years old with AOM were screened by using a novel AOM-severity screening index. Parents of children with nonsevere AOM received an educational intervention, and their children were randomized to receive either immediate antibiotics (ABX; amoxicillin plus symptom medication) or watchful waiting (WW; symptom medication only). The investigators, but not the parents, were blinded to enrollment status. Primary outcomes included parent satisfaction with AOM care, resolution of symptoms, AOM failure/recurrence, and nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to ABX. Secondary outcomes included medication-related adverse events, serious adverse events, unanticipated AOM-related office and emergency department visits and telephone calls, the child's absence from day care or school resulting from AOM, the parent's absence from school or work because of their child's AOM, and costs of treatment. Subjects were defined as failing (days 0-12) or recurring (days 13-30) if they experienced a higher AOM-severity score on reexamination.
A total of 223 subjects were recruited: 73% were nonwhite, 57% were <2 years old, 47% attended day care, 82% had experienced prior AOM, and 83% had not been fully immunized with heptavalent pneumococcal vaccine. One hundred twelve were randomized to ABX, and 111 were randomized to WW. Ninety-four percent of the subjects were followed to the 30-day end point. Parent satisfaction with AOM care was not different between the 2 treatment groups at either day 12 or 30. Compared with WW, symptom scores on days 1 to 10 resolved faster in subjects treated with immediate ABX. At day 12, among the immediate-ABX group, 69% of tympanic membranes and 25% of tympanograms were normal, compared with 51% of normal tympanic membranes and 10% of normal tympanograms in the WW group. Parents of children in the ABX group gave their children fewer doses of pain medication than did parents of children in the WW group. Subjects in the ABX group experienced 16% fewer failures than subjects in the WW group. Of the children in the WW group, 66% completed the study without needing ABX. Immediate ABX resulted in eradication of S pneumoniae carriage in the majority of children, but S pneumoniae strains cultured from children in the ABX group at day 12 were more likely to be multidrug-resistant than strains from children in the WW group. More ABX-related adverse events were noted in the ABX group, compared with the WW group. No serious AOM-related adverse events were observed in either group. Office and emergency department visits, phone calls, and days of work/school missed were not different between groups. Prescriptions for ABX were reduced by 73% in the WW group compared with the ABX group. Costs of ABX averaged $47.41 per subject in the ABX group and $11.43 in the WW group.
Sixty-six percent of subjects in the WW group completed the study without ABX. Parent satisfaction was the same between groups regardless of treatment. Compared with WW, immediate ABX treatment was associated with decreased numbers of treatment failures and improved symptom control but increased ABX-related adverse events and a higher percent carriage of multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae strains in the nasopharynx at the day-12 visit. Key factors in implementing a WW strategy were (a) a method to classify AOM severity; (b) parent education; (c) management of AOM symptoms; (d) access to follow-up care; and (e) use of an effective ABX regimen, when needed. When these caveats are observed, WW may be an acceptable alternative to immediate ABX for some children with nonsevere AOM.
抗生素在急性中耳炎(AOM)治疗中的广泛使用导致了难以治疗的多重耐药病原体的出现。然而,已有研究表明,大多数非重度AOM患儿无需使用抗生素即可康复。本研究的目的是评估针对非重度AOM患儿的非抗生素干预措施的安全性、有效性、可接受性和成本。
采用一种新型的AOM严重程度筛查指标对6个月至12岁的AOM患儿进行筛查。非重度AOM患儿的家长接受教育干预,其子女被随机分为两组,一组立即接受抗生素治疗(ABX;阿莫西林加对症药物),另一组进行观察等待(WW;仅使用对症药物)。研究人员对入组情况不知情,但家长知晓。主要结局包括家长对AOM治疗的满意度、症状缓解情况、AOM治疗失败/复发以及对ABX耐药的肺炎链球菌菌株在鼻咽部的携带情况。次要结局包括与药物相关的不良事件、严重不良事件、意外的与AOM相关的门诊和急诊科就诊及电话咨询、因AOM导致患儿缺课或缺托、因孩子患AOM导致家长缺勤以及治疗成本。如果受试者在复查时AOM严重程度评分升高,则被定义为治疗失败(第0 - 12天)或复发(第13 - 30天)。
共招募了223名受试者:73%为非白人,57%年龄小于2岁,47%参加日托,82%曾患过AOM,83%未完全接种七价肺炎球菌疫苗。112名受试者被随机分配至ABX组,111名被随机分配至WW组。94%的受试者随访至30天终点。在第12天和第30天,两个治疗组家长对AOM治疗的满意度无差异。与WW组相比,立即接受ABX治疗的受试者在第1至10天的症状评分缓解更快。在第12天,立即接受ABX治疗组中,69%的鼓膜和2,5%的鼓室图正常,而WW组中这两个比例分别为51%和10%。ABX组患儿的家长给孩子使用的止痛药物剂量少于WW组患儿的家长。ABX组的治疗失败率比WW组低16%。WW组中,66%的患儿在无需使用ABX的情况下完成了研究。立即使用ABX可使大多数患儿的肺炎链球菌携带情况得到根除,但在第12天从ABX组患儿中培养出的肺炎链球菌菌株比WW组患儿的菌株更易出现多重耐药。与WW组相比,ABX组记录到更多与ABX相关的不良事件。两组均未观察到严重的与AOM相关的不良事件。两组在门诊和急诊科就诊、电话咨询以及缺课/缺托天数方面无差异。与ABX组相比,WW组的ABX处方减少了73%。ABX组每位受试者的ABX平均成本为47.41美元,WW组为11.43美元。
WW组中66%的受试者在未使用ABX的情况下完成了研究。无论采用何种治疗方法,两组家长的满意度相同。与WW组相比,立即使用ABX治疗可减少治疗失败次数并改善症状控制,但会增加与ABX相关的不良事件,且在第12天就诊时鼻咽部多重耐药肺炎链球菌菌株的携带率更高。实施WW策略的关键因素包括:(a)一种AOM严重程度分类方法;(b)家长教育;(c)AOM症状管理;(d)获得后续护理的途径;(e)必要时使用有效的ABX治疗方案。在遵循这些注意事项的情况下,对于一些非重度AOM患儿,WW可能是立即使用ABX的一种可接受的替代方法。