Kuntz R E, Safian R D, Levine M J, Reis G J, Diver D J, Baim D S
Charles A. Dana Research Institut, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1493-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90609-q.
Restenosis after coronary intervention has remained a vexing problem despite the introduction of nearly 24 newer coronary interventional devices. To more clearly evaluate the potential impact of three such new devices on restenosis, coronary lumen diameters were measured before, immediately after and at 6 months after intervention, and restenosis was analyzed using continuous geometric techniques. Lumen diameters were measured before and immediately after intervention in 223 coronary vessels treated with one of three new devices: a single Palmaz-Schatz stent (n = 87), directional atherectomy (n = 125) and laser balloon angioplasty (n = 11); 184 (83%) of the patients underwent follow-up angiography 6 months after treatment. The immediate increase in lumen diameter produced by the intervention (acute gain) and the subsequent reduction in lumen diameter between the time of intervention to 6 month follow-up study (late loss) were examined. For each of the three interventions, the restenosis rate at follow-up study was analyzed using a traditional dichotomous definition (greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis), as well as a novel graphic technique. Although the apparent restenosis rates differed significantly among the three interventions (19% for stents, 31% for atherectomy and 50% for laser balloon angioplasty; p = 0.02), late loss among the three interventions was equivalent (average 1 mm; p = 0.91). There were, however, marked differences in the acute gain achieved by the three interventions: 2.6 mm for stents, 2.2 mm for atherectomy and 2 mm for laser balloon angioplasty; p less than 0.001). It was these differences in acute gain rather than late loss that explained the observed differences in restenosis rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
尽管已引入近24种新型冠状动脉介入装置,但冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄仍是一个棘手的问题。为了更清楚地评估三种此类新装置对再狭窄的潜在影响,在介入治疗前、治疗后即刻以及治疗后6个月测量冠状动脉管腔直径,并使用连续几何技术分析再狭窄情况。对使用三种新装置之一治疗的223条冠状动脉血管在介入治疗前和治疗后即刻测量管腔直径:单个Palmaz-Schatz支架(n = 87)、定向旋切术(n = 125)和激光球囊血管成形术(n = 11);184例(83%)患者在治疗后6个月接受了随访血管造影。研究了介入治疗导致的管腔直径即刻增加(急性增益)以及介入治疗至6个月随访研究期间管腔直径的后续减小(晚期丢失)。对于三种介入治疗中的每一种,使用传统的二分法定义(直径狭窄大于或等于50%)以及一种新颖的图形技术分析随访研究中的再狭窄率。尽管三种介入治疗的表面再狭窄率有显著差异(支架为19%,旋切术为31%,激光球囊血管成形术为50%;p = 0.02),但三种介入治疗的晚期丢失相当(平均1 mm;p = 0.91)。然而,三种介入治疗实现的急性增益存在显著差异:支架为2.6 mm,旋切术为2.2 mm,激光球囊血管成形术为2 mm;p<0.001)。正是这些急性增益的差异而非晚期丢失的差异解释了观察到的再狭窄率差异。(摘要截断于250字)