• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三种新型冠状动脉装置后再狭窄分析的新方法。

Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices.

作者信息

Kuntz R E, Safian R D, Levine M J, Reis G J, Diver D J, Baim D S

机构信息

Charles A. Dana Research Institut, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1493-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90609-q.

DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(92)90609-q
PMID:1593044
Abstract

Restenosis after coronary intervention has remained a vexing problem despite the introduction of nearly 24 newer coronary interventional devices. To more clearly evaluate the potential impact of three such new devices on restenosis, coronary lumen diameters were measured before, immediately after and at 6 months after intervention, and restenosis was analyzed using continuous geometric techniques. Lumen diameters were measured before and immediately after intervention in 223 coronary vessels treated with one of three new devices: a single Palmaz-Schatz stent (n = 87), directional atherectomy (n = 125) and laser balloon angioplasty (n = 11); 184 (83%) of the patients underwent follow-up angiography 6 months after treatment. The immediate increase in lumen diameter produced by the intervention (acute gain) and the subsequent reduction in lumen diameter between the time of intervention to 6 month follow-up study (late loss) were examined. For each of the three interventions, the restenosis rate at follow-up study was analyzed using a traditional dichotomous definition (greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis), as well as a novel graphic technique. Although the apparent restenosis rates differed significantly among the three interventions (19% for stents, 31% for atherectomy and 50% for laser balloon angioplasty; p = 0.02), late loss among the three interventions was equivalent (average 1 mm; p = 0.91). There were, however, marked differences in the acute gain achieved by the three interventions: 2.6 mm for stents, 2.2 mm for atherectomy and 2 mm for laser balloon angioplasty; p less than 0.001). It was these differences in acute gain rather than late loss that explained the observed differences in restenosis rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

尽管已引入近24种新型冠状动脉介入装置,但冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄仍是一个棘手的问题。为了更清楚地评估三种此类新装置对再狭窄的潜在影响,在介入治疗前、治疗后即刻以及治疗后6个月测量冠状动脉管腔直径,并使用连续几何技术分析再狭窄情况。对使用三种新装置之一治疗的223条冠状动脉血管在介入治疗前和治疗后即刻测量管腔直径:单个Palmaz-Schatz支架(n = 87)、定向旋切术(n = 125)和激光球囊血管成形术(n = 11);184例(83%)患者在治疗后6个月接受了随访血管造影。研究了介入治疗导致的管腔直径即刻增加(急性增益)以及介入治疗至6个月随访研究期间管腔直径的后续减小(晚期丢失)。对于三种介入治疗中的每一种,使用传统的二分法定义(直径狭窄大于或等于50%)以及一种新颖的图形技术分析随访研究中的再狭窄率。尽管三种介入治疗的表面再狭窄率有显著差异(支架为19%,旋切术为31%,激光球囊血管成形术为50%;p = 0.02),但三种介入治疗的晚期丢失相当(平均1 mm;p = 0.91)。然而,三种介入治疗实现的急性增益存在显著差异:支架为2.6 mm,旋切术为2.2 mm,激光球囊血管成形术为2 mm;p<0.001)。正是这些急性增益的差异而非晚期丢失的差异解释了观察到的再狭窄率差异。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices.使用三种新型冠状动脉装置后再狭窄分析的新方法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1493-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90609-q.
2
Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械再狭窄倾向的差异。球囊血管成形术、定向旋切术、支架植入术和准分子激光血管成形术的定量血管造影比较。CARPORT、MERCATOR、MARCATOR、PARK和BENESTENT试验组。
Eur Heart J. 1995 Oct;16(10):1331-46. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060740.
3
Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jan;21(1):15-25. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90712-a.
4
The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting.
Circulation. 1992 Dec;86(6):1827-35. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.6.1827.
5
Lesion-to-lesion independence of restenosis after treatment by conventional angioplasty, stenting, or directional atherectomy. Validation of lesion-based restenosis analysis.传统血管成形术、支架置入术或定向旋切术治疗后再狭窄的病变间独立性。基于病变的再狭窄分析的验证。
Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1123-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1123.
6
Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty.Palmaz-Schatz支架植入术后的系列血管造影随访:与传统球囊血管成形术的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jun;21(7):1557-63. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90368-b.
7
[Are directional coronary atherectomy and Palmaz-Schatz stent more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty for treating de novo coronary artery lesions?].[定向冠状动脉斑块旋切术和帕尔马兹-沙茨支架在治疗冠状动脉初发病变方面是否比传统球囊血管成形术更有效?]
J Cardiol. 1997 Sep;30(3):117-24.
8
Analysis of late lumen narrowing after excimer laser-facilitated coronary angioplasty.准分子激光辅助冠状动脉成形术后晚期管腔狭窄的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 May;23(6):1314-20. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90372-7.
9
Mechanisms of restenosis and redilation within coronary stents--quantitative angiographic assessment.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄和再扩张的机制——定量血管造影评估
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Apr;21(5):1166-74. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90241-r.
10
Inter-series differences in the restenosis rate of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent placement: differences in demographics and post-procedure lumen diameter.帕尔马兹-沙茨冠状动脉支架置入术后再狭窄率的系列间差异:人口统计学和术后管腔直径的差异。
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994 Mar;31(3):173-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810310303.

引用本文的文献

1
Laser Versus Rotational Atherectomy in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Procedural Success and Safety.冠状动脉疾病中激光与旋磨术的比较:手术成功率及安全性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 May 26;17(5):e84832. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84832. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.小冠状动脉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结局:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 14;9:1017833. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833. eCollection 2022.
3
Is Coronary Brachytherapy Staging a Comeback for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis?
冠状动脉内照射治疗术是否会重新成为支架内再狭窄的治疗手段?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Oct 1;23(11):156. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01582-4.
4
Influence of metal alloy and the profile of coronary stents in patients with multivessel coronary disease.多支血管病变患者中金属合金和冠状动脉支架形态的影响。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(6):985-9. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000600011.
5
Evaluation of fluorinated polymers as coronary stent coating.氟化聚合物作为冠状动脉支架涂层的评估。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000 Apr;11(4):207-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1008908007424.
6
Genetic risk factors and restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的遗传风险因素与再狭窄
Herz. 2000 Feb;25(1):34-46. doi: 10.1007/BF03044122.
7
Dynamics of Vascular Remodeling: An Overview and Bibliography.血管重塑的动力学:综述与文献目录
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1996;3(1):71-86. doi: 10.1007/BF00226415.
8
Nuclear cardiology: the interventionalists' perspective.
J Nucl Cardiol. 1994 Jul-Aug;1(4):415-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02939962.