Gladman D D, Goldsmith C H, Urowitz M B, Bacon P, Bombardier C, Isenberg D, Kalunian K, Liang M H, Maddison P, Nived O
University of Toronto Rheumatology Disease Unit, Wellesley Hospital, ON, Canada.
J Rheumatol. 1992 Apr;19(4):608-11.
Rheumatologists from 4 countries, representing 8 rheumatology centers, tested 3 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity indices: the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) from Toronto; the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) from Boston and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) for their reproducibility and validity in the assessment of real patients. Seven patients representing a spectrum of disease manifestations and activity were each examined by 4 of 7 observers from all centers except Toronto, using a Youden square design. Each observer completed all 3 indices and a category rating scale for disease activity on each of the 4 patients seen. All 3 indices detected differences among patients. There was no detectable observer effect among the 7 observers with each of the 3 indices. There was a detectable order effect with the SLAM. The 3 indices are comparable and reproducible for evaluating disease activity in SLE.
来自4个国家、代表8个风湿病中心的风湿病学家,对3种系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)疾病活动指数进行了测试:来自多伦多的SLE疾病活动指数(SLEDAI);来自波士顿的系统性狼疮活动度量表(SLAM)以及不列颠群岛狼疮评估组(BILAG),以评估它们在评估实际患者时的可重复性和有效性。采用尤登方设计,除多伦多外,来自所有中心的7名观察者中的4名对7例代表一系列疾病表现和活动的患者进行了检查。每位观察者对所检查的4例患者分别完成了所有3种指数以及疾病活动的分类评定量表。所有3种指数均检测到了患者之间的差异。在使用3种指数中的任何一种时,7名观察者之间均未检测到观察者效应。使用SLAM时检测到了顺序效应。这3种指数在评估SLE疾病活动方面具有可比性和可重复性。