Suppr超能文献

3种系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数对变化的敏感性:国际验证

Sensitivity to change of 3 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Indices: international validation.

作者信息

Gladman D D, Goldsmith C H, Urowitz M B, Bacon P, Bombardier C, Isenberg D, Kalunian K, Liang M H, Maddison P, Nived O

机构信息

University of Toronto Rheumatic Disease Unit, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1994 Aug;21(8):1468-71.

PMID:7983648
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Three indices, the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), have been found to be reliable and valid measures of disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our aim was to investigate their use and comparative ability to assess change in disease activity over time.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory features of 8 patients with SLE on each of 3 consecutive visits were abstracted and sent in 3 separate packages to physicians from 8 centers. The order of the patient visit summaries was randomized, and the 3 indices rated in one of 6 specific sequences.

RESULTS

The 3 indices were significantly (p < 0.01) correlated: SLEDAI/SLAM = 0.61, BILAG/SLAM = 0.55, SLEDAI/BILAG = 0.35. The sequence presented, the order of patients and order of index scoring did not contribute significantly (p > 0.05) to the variation of any of the 3 indices. All 3 indices detected differences among patients (p < 0.01). Differences between visits were detectable with SLEDAI (p = 0.04) but not with SLAM or BILAG:

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that the SLEDAI, SLAM and BILAG are comparable disease activity measures. SLEDAI appears to be sensitive to change in disease activity over time.

摘要

目的

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)、系统性狼疮活动度测量(SLAM)和英伦三岛狼疮评估组(BILAG)这三项指标,已被证实是评估SLE患者疾病活动度的可靠且有效的指标。我们的目的是研究它们评估疾病活动度随时间变化的用途及比较能力。

方法

连续3次就诊时,8例SLE患者的临床和实验室特征被提取出来,并分3个独立的资料包发送给8个中心的医生。患者就诊总结的顺序是随机的,3项指标按6种特定顺序之一进行评分。

结果

这3项指标显著相关(p < 0.01):SLEDAI/SLAM = 0.61,BILAG/SLAM = 0.55,SLEDAI/BILAG = 0.35。所呈现的顺序、患者顺序和指标评分顺序对这3项指标中任何一项的变异均无显著影响(p > 0.05)。所有3项指标均能检测出患者之间的差异(p < 0.01)。SLEDAI可检测出就诊之间的差异(p = 0.04),但SLAM和BILAG则不能。

结论

我们的研究证实,SLEDAI、SLAM和BILAG是可比的疾病活动度测量指标。SLEDAI似乎对疾病活动度随时间的变化敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验