Salzman Carl
Hravard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Acad Psychiatry. 2005 May-Jun;29(2):176-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.2.176.
To consider the limited usefulness of expert guidelines for teaching psychopharmacology.
Potential problems using expert guidelines for teaching psychopharmacology are reviewed.
Expert guidelines are an important contribution to the growth of evidence-based psychiatry. As such, they may also be used to teach fundamentals of psychopharmacology. Their use as teaching materials may be limited by their reliance on Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnoses, especially for patients with unclear or complicated diagnosing pictures. Biases may also exist in their construction and the data from which they are derived. Other problems include overemphasis on newly released medications and the potential for teaching a "cookbook" approach to psychopharmacology treatment, limiting the development of the "art" of psychopharmacology practice.
Although expert guidelines may be a useful tool for teaching psychopharmacology, they also may limit the teaching of psychopharmacology. Comprehensive psychopharmacology training programs that use expert guidelines as teaching tools should emphasize critical reading of clinical trials literature and teaching the use of all psychotropic drugs. Training in the art of psychopharmacology including, nonpharmacological aspects of drug treatment, should also be included.
探讨专家指南在精神药理学教学中的有限实用性。
回顾使用专家指南进行精神药理学教学时可能存在的问题。
专家指南对循证精神病学的发展有重要贡献。因此,它们也可用于教授精神药理学的基础知识。然而,其作为教材的用途可能受到限制,因为它们依赖于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的诊断标准,特别是对于诊断情况不明确或复杂的患者。在指南的制定过程及其所依据的数据中也可能存在偏差。其他问题包括过度强调新发布的药物,以及可能导致采用“食谱式”方法进行精神药理学治疗,从而限制了精神药理学实践“艺术”的发展。
尽管专家指南可能是精神药理学教学的有用工具,但它们也可能限制精神药理学的教学。将专家指南作为教学工具的综合精神药理学培训项目应强调对临床试验文献的批判性阅读,并教授所有精神药物的使用方法。还应包括精神药理学实践艺术的培训,包括药物治疗的非药物方面。