Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍的诊断:虽有问题但比其他选择要好。

The diagnosis of borderline personality disorder: problematic but better than the alternatives.

作者信息

Paris Joel

机构信息

McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Jan-Mar;17(1):41-6. doi: 10.1080/10401230590905461.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review is to examine empirical evidence concerning critiques of the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD): for uncertain validity, and for overlap with other mental disorders.

METHODS

A review of the literature on the validity and comorbidity of BPD was conducted.

RESULTS

Since BPD is a complex multidimensional construct, its validity is inevitably problematic, but no more so than most other psychiatric diagnoses. The comorbidity of BPD is probably an artefact of the current classification system, and there is no convincing evidence that BPD is a variant of an Axis I disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further research should lead to changes in classification, the diagnosis of BPD retains significant clinical utility.

摘要

背景

本综述的目的是审视关于边缘型人格障碍(BPD)诊断批评的实证证据:其有效性存疑,且与其他精神障碍存在重叠。

方法

对有关BPD有效性和共病性的文献进行了综述。

结果

由于BPD是一个复杂的多维度概念,其有效性不可避免地存在问题,但并不比大多数其他精神科诊断更严重。BPD的共病性可能是当前分类系统的人为产物,且没有令人信服的证据表明BPD是轴I障碍的一种变体。

结论

虽然进一步的研究应会导致分类的改变,但BPD的诊断仍具有显著的临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验