Ciftci Ferda, Pocan Sibel, Karadayi Koray, Gulecek Oguz
Department of Ophthalmology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, GATA Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 May;21(3):201-6. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000163317.73873.c9.
To compare the effectiveness, complications, and patient acceptance of local anesthesia with general anesthesia in young patients for external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).
Data were prospectively collected over an 8-year period (1996-2004) on young patients (mean age: 22.64+/-1.71) undergoing external DCR in Gulhane Military Medical Academy. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups: general anesthesia (GA) and local anesthesia (LA). Of the 480 DCR procedures, 182 were performed with general anesthesia (44 bilateral), 298 were performed with local anesthesia (32 bilateral). Visual analogue scales were recorded in the postoperative 2-hour period. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), epistaxis, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative bleeding were noted.
Patients in both groups reported being comfortable during and immediately after surgery. Only 2 patients in the LA group required additional local anesthetic because of pain. Intraoperative bleeding was lower in the LA group. Analgesic requirement and signs of nausea and vomiting in the GA group were higher in the early postoperative period (p<0.05). The incidence of PONV was higher (p<0.05) in the GA group. Postoperative epistaxis was observed in 12 patients in the GA group and just 2 patients in the LA group. Length of hospital stay was 2.29+/-0.46 days in the GA group, and 1.23+/-0.42 days in the LA group (p<0.01).
Local anesthesia in DCR is safe and comfortable when proper anatomical approach to nerve blocks is performed correctly. Local anesthesia in young patients undergoing external DCR is a good alternative because it is cost-effective and it eliminates the complications of general anesthesia.
比较局部麻醉与全身麻醉在年轻患者外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR)中的有效性、并发症及患者接受度。
前瞻性收集了1996年至2004年8年间在古尔汗军事医学院接受外路DCR的年轻患者(平均年龄:22.64±1.71岁)的数据。患者被随机分为两组:全身麻醉(GA)组和局部麻醉(LA)组。在480例DCR手术中,182例采用全身麻醉(44例双侧),298例采用局部麻醉(32例双侧)。记录术后2小时的视觉模拟评分。记录术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、鼻出血、住院时间及术中出血情况。
两组患者均表示手术期间及术后即刻感觉舒适。LA组仅有2例患者因疼痛需要追加局部麻醉药。LA组术中出血较少。GA组术后早期镇痛需求及恶心呕吐迹象更高(p<0.05)。GA组PONV发生率更高(p<0.05)。GA组有12例患者出现术后鼻出血,LA组仅有2例。GA组住院时间为2.29±0.46天,LA组为1.23±0.42天(p<0.01)。
当正确进行神经阻滞的适当解剖入路时,DCR中的局部麻醉是安全且舒适的。对于接受外路DCR的年轻患者,局部麻醉是一种很好的选择,因为它具有成本效益且可消除全身麻醉的并发症。