Suppr超能文献

[阿尔茨海默病与血管性痴呆——二分法还是相互作用?]

[Alzheimer's disease versus vascular dementia -- dichotomy or interaction?].

作者信息

Hentschel F, Supprian T, Frölich L

机构信息

Abteilung Neuroradiologie und Abteilung für Gerontopsychiatrie des ZI, Fakultät für klinische Medizin Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg.

出版信息

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2005 Jun;73(6):317-26. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830101.

Abstract

Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and vascular dementia (VD) are the two major forms of dementia in the elderly. They have been separated categorically on the basis of pathophysiological findings and clinical operationalized criteria. However, this strict separation has to be reevaluated in the light of recent data. The risk to develop a neurodegenerative dementia in old age is determined by various susceptibility genes and correlated with aging. In AD, the current understanding of pathophysiology focuses on the amyloid cascade hypothesis as the major endpoint of the complex cellular pathology. In VD, incomplete microangiopathic infarcts due to fibrohyalinosis are regarded as the major pathophysiological event. A controversial discussion exists about the coincidence or interaction of genetically determined risk factors of AD and/or VD. Further interactions between AD and VD exist with regard to perivascular mediators and those factors which impair cerebral blood flow. Based on these and other recent neuropathological and therapeutic findings the hypothesis is proposed that the two specific etiopathologies of AD and VD interact to precipitate clinical dementia in the individual and that the individual phenomenology of these dementias is modified by vascular risk factors. Neither, a categorical separation of AD and VD nor the recent idea to regard AD as a distinct form of vascular dementia, do appear convincing.

摘要

阿尔茨海默病性痴呆(AD)和血管性痴呆(VD)是老年人痴呆的两种主要形式。它们已根据病理生理学发现和临床实用标准进行了明确分类。然而,鉴于最近的数据,这种严格的分类必须重新评估。老年发生神经退行性痴呆的风险由多种易感基因决定,并与衰老相关。在AD中,目前对病理生理学的理解集中在淀粉样蛋白级联假说,将其视为复杂细胞病理学的主要终点。在VD中,纤维透明变性导致的不完全微血管梗死被视为主要的病理生理事件。关于AD和/或VD的遗传决定风险因素的巧合或相互作用存在争议性讨论。在血管周围介质和那些损害脑血流的因素方面,AD和VD之间还存在进一步的相互作用。基于这些以及其他最近的神经病理学和治疗学发现,提出了这样的假说:AD和VD这两种特定的病因相互作用,促使个体发生临床痴呆,并且这些痴呆的个体表现会受到血管危险因素的影响。AD和VD的明确分类,以及最近将AD视为血管性痴呆的一种独特形式的观点,似乎都缺乏说服力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验