Amirav I, Newhouse M T
Pediatric Department, R. Sieff Hospital, Safed, Israel.
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):389-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.389.
Masks are an essential interface between valved holding chambers (VHCs), or spacers, and a small child's face for providing aerosol therapy. Clinical experience suggests that many young children do not cooperate with the VHC treatment or tolerate a mask of any kind. This might impair the mask-face seal and reduce the dose delivered to the child. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of parents to provide a good mask-face seal in infants and toddlers using 3 masks provided with commonly used pediatric VHCs and compare this with the seal obtained with the Hans Rudolph pediatric anesthesia mask.
A preliminary in vitro filter study was conducted to validate the assumption that reduced ventilation as a result of increased facemask leak reduces the drug aerosol dose delivered to the mouth. Facemask leak then was studied in vivo for NebuChamber, AeroChamber, BabyHaler, and Hans Rudolph masks by measuring ventilation with an in-line pneumotachograph while the facemask was held in place by experienced parents who were asked to demonstrate how they deliver medication to their children without any additional instruction. Thirty children (mean age: 3.2 +/- 1.4 years) performed 4 repeat studies with each mask. The first 10 patients performed the tests once again within 1 month. On the second occasion, the parents were coached continuously and encouraged to hold the mask tightly against the child's face.
The AeroChamber and Hans Rudolph masks provided the best seal as reflected in the magnitude of the ventilation measured through them. The NebuChamber provided the poorest seal, with 45% less ventilation than the AeroChamber and Hans Rudolph masks. There was considerable intraindividual variability for all masks (24% to 48%); however, the variability with the NebuChamber mask was 2-fold greater than the other masks. All ventilatory volumes during the coached session were significantly greater than during the uncoached session. Variability during the coached session was significantly less (except for the BabyHaler, which remained unchanged).
VHCs with masks designed for use with small children may provide a poor seal with the face, leading to reduced or more variable dose delivery. The facemask seal is critical for efficient aerosol delivery to infants and young children, and this should be stressed to parents.
面罩是带阀储雾罐(VHCs)或储物器与幼儿面部之间的重要连接部件,用于进行雾化治疗。临床经验表明,许多幼儿不配合VHC治疗,或无法耐受任何类型的面罩。这可能会破坏面罩与面部的密封,减少输送给儿童的剂量。本研究的目的是评估家长使用常用儿科VHCs配备的3种面罩在婴幼儿面部实现良好密封的能力,并将其与使用汉斯·鲁道夫儿科麻醉面罩获得的密封效果进行比较。
进行了一项初步的体外过滤器研究,以验证因面罩泄漏增加导致通气减少会降低输送到口腔的药物气雾剂剂量这一假设。然后,通过在线呼吸流速计测量通气情况,在体内研究了NebuChamber、AeroChamber、BabyHaler和汉斯·鲁道夫面罩的面罩泄漏情况,面罩由经验丰富的家长固定在合适位置,要求他们在没有任何额外指导的情况下演示如何给孩子用药。30名儿童(平均年龄:3.2±1.4岁)对每种面罩进行了4次重复研究。前10名患者在1个月内再次进行了测试。第二次测试时,对家长进行持续指导,并鼓励他们将面罩紧紧贴在孩子脸上。
AeroChamber和汉斯·鲁道夫面罩的密封效果最佳,通过它们测量的通气量可以反映出来。NebuChamber的密封效果最差,通气量比AeroChamber和汉斯·鲁道夫面罩少45%。所有面罩的个体内差异都很大(24%至48%);然而,NebuChamber面罩的差异比其他面罩大2倍。指导过程中的所有通气量均显著大于未指导过程中的通气量。指导过程中的差异显著较小(BabyHaler除外,其保持不变)。
为幼儿设计的带面罩VHCs可能与面部密封不佳,导致剂量输送减少或更不稳定。面罩密封对于向婴幼儿有效输送气雾剂至关重要,应向家长强调这一点。