Suppr超能文献

普通冰与调味冰预防5-氟尿嘧啶所致口腔黏膜炎的比较

Comparison of plain ice and flavoured ice for preventing oral mucositis associated with the use of 5 fluorouracil.

作者信息

Nikoletti Sue, Hyde Susan, Shaw Thérèse, Myers Helen, Kristjanson Linda J

机构信息

Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14(6):750-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01156.x.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to compare the use of plain ice, flavoured ice and standard care, to evaluate the effect on mucositis and to determine patients' perceptions of the two forms of oral cryotherapy.

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that oral cryotherapy is useful in preventing mucositis in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil, concerns have been expressed about its clinical utility, due to potential side effects and negative perceptions.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled, crossover trial was conducted in the outpatient chemotherapy department of an acute care teaching hospital in Perth, Western Australia. Patients were randomized to receive each of three interventions across three cycles of chemotherapy: standard care alone; standard care plus plain ice; and standard care plus flavoured ice.

METHODS

Oral mucositis was assessed by nurses prior to each of the three chemotherapy cycles and 15 days after each intervention. Two assessment tools were used, the Oral Assessment Guide, and the Western Consortium Cancer Nursing Research Scale. Participants completed a questionnaire to determine their comfort and satisfaction with oral cryotherapy, as well as factors affecting compliance.

RESULTS

Findings from 67 patients revealed that when participants used standard care alone, they were significantly more likely to experience symptoms of mucositis than when they used either plain or flavoured ice. Odds ratios were at least threefold higher for standard care alone, varying according to the instrument used. The two main concerns reported were the taste of flavoured ice and the time required to complete the cryotherapy interventions. Side effects such as nausea, sensitivity and headache were reported more frequently for flavoured ice (n = 11) compared with plain ice (n = 5) and standard care (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Both forms of oral cryotherapy were effective in reducing the severity of oral mucositis after chemotherapy and were more effective than standard care alone. Flavoured ice was associated with the highest frequency of side effects.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The benefits of cryotherapy appear to outweigh the problems in this sample of patients. The intervention should be tailored to individual patients, based on preferences for plain versus flavoured ice and small chips vs. larger blocks. Unsweetened frozen fruit juices should be evaluated. Time constraints could be addressed by providing transportable containers of ice.

摘要

目的与目标

本研究旨在比较普通冰块、调味冰块与标准护理的使用情况,评估其对口腔黏膜炎的影响,并确定患者对两种口腔冷冻疗法的看法。

背景

尽管有证据表明口腔冷冻疗法有助于预防接受5-氟尿嘧啶治疗的患者发生口腔黏膜炎,但由于潜在的副作用和负面看法,人们对其临床效用表示担忧。

设计

在西澳大利亚珀斯一家急性护理教学医院的门诊化疗科进行了一项随机对照交叉试验。患者在三个化疗周期中随机接受三种干预措施:仅标准护理;标准护理加普通冰块;标准护理加调味冰块。

方法

护士在三个化疗周期的每个周期之前以及每次干预后15天对口腔黏膜炎进行评估。使用了两种评估工具,即口腔评估指南和西部联盟癌症护理研究量表。参与者完成了一份问卷,以确定他们对口腔冷冻疗法的舒适度和满意度,以及影响依从性的因素。

结果

67名患者的研究结果显示,与使用普通冰块或调味冰块相比,仅采用标准护理时,患者出现口腔黏膜炎症状的可能性显著更高。仅标准护理的优势比至少高出三倍,具体数值因所使用的工具而异。报告的两个主要问题是调味冰块的味道以及完成冷冻疗法干预所需的时间。与普通冰块(n = 5)和标准护理(n = 1)相比,调味冰块(n = 11)导致恶心、敏感和头痛等副作用的报告更为频繁。

结论

两种口腔冷冻疗法均能有效减轻化疗后口腔黏膜炎的严重程度,且比单独的标准护理更有效。调味冰块的副作用发生率最高。

与临床实践的相关性

在该患者样本中,冷冻疗法的益处似乎超过了问题。应根据患者对普通冰块与调味冰块以及小冰块与大冰块的偏好,为个体患者量身定制干预措施。应评估未加糖的冷冻果汁。可通过提供可携带的冰块容器来解决时间限制问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验