Aho Tevita F, Gilling Peter J, Kennett Katie M, Westenberg Andre M, Fraundorfer Mark R, Frampton Chris M
Department of Urology, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga and Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):210-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161610.68204.ee.
Bladder neck incision (BNI) is a common, minimally invasive treatment option for bladder outflow obstruction in men with a small prostate. We compared BNI using the holmium:YAG laser to holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in a prospective, randomized, urodynamically based trial.
A total of 40 patients with urodynamic obstruction (Schafer grade 2 or greater) and a prostate of 40 gm or greater on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) were randomized equally to holmium laser BNI (HoBNI) or HoLEP as an outpatient procedure. The outcomes assessed were operative time, catheter time and hospital time. American Urological Association and quality of life scores, and maximal urinary flow rates were measured at baseline, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, while pressure flow studies and TRUS volume measurement were performed at baseline and 6 months.
The 2 groups were well matched for all variables at baseline. HoBNI was significantly more rapid to perform than HoLEP (p <0.001). Two patients (10%) in the HoBNI group required recatheterization compared with none in the HoLEP group. There was no significant difference in catheter time (22.9 vs 23.2 hours) or hospital time (12.3 vs 13.7 hours) between the groups. Five patients remained obstructed urodynamically at 6 months. All were in the HoBNI group and 4 of the 5 men had a prostate that was greater than 30 gm. Four of these patients required HoLEP for persistent lower urinary tract symptoms. In the remaining unoperated patients there were no significant differences in American Urological Association and quality of life scores or in the maximal urinary flow rate at each assessment. At 6 months detrusor pressure at maximal urinary flow was significantly lower (p <0.05) and TRUS volume was significantly smaller (p <0.001) in the HoLEP group There was significantly more early stress incontinence postoperatively in the HoLEP group but no bladder neck contractures were detected.
Relief of obstruction was better after HoLEP and fewer patients required recatheterization or reoperation, although more reported early postoperative stress incontinence. Catheter time, hospital time and perioperative morbidity were similar. HoBNI and HoLEP are safe and feasible as outpatient procedures in patients with a small prostate but HoBNI is more rapid to perform.
膀胱颈切开术(BNI)是治疗前列腺较小的男性膀胱出口梗阻的一种常见的微创治疗选择。我们在一项基于尿动力学的前瞻性随机试验中,比较了钬激光膀胱颈切开术(HoBNI)与钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)。
共有40例尿动力学梗阻( Schafer分级2级或更高)且经直肠超声(TRUS)检查前列腺体积≥40克的患者,被随机均分为钬激光膀胱颈切开术组(HoBNI)或钬激光前列腺剜除术组(HoLEP),作为门诊手术进行。评估的结果指标包括手术时间、导尿管留置时间和住院时间。在基线、术后1、3、6和12个月时测量美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)评分、生活质量评分以及最大尿流率,同时在基线和6个月时进行压力流率研究和TRUS体积测量。
两组在基线时所有变量均匹配良好。HoBNI的手术操作明显比HoLEP更快(p<0.001)。HoBNI组有2例患者(10%)需要再次留置导尿管,而HoLEP组无此情况。两组之间的导尿管留置时间(22.9小时对23.2小时)或住院时间(12.3小时对13.7小时)无显著差异。6个月时,有5例患者尿动力学仍存在梗阻。所有患者均在HoBNI组,5例男性中有4例前列腺体积大于30克。其中4例患者因持续的下尿路症状需要接受HoLEP治疗。在其余未接受再次手术的患者中,每次评估时的AUA评分、生活质量评分或最大尿流率均无显著差异。在6个月时,HoLEP组最大尿流时的逼尿肌压力显著更低(p<0.05),TRUS测量的前列腺体积显著更小(p<0.001)。HoLEP组术后早期压力性尿失禁的发生率显著更高,但未检测到膀胱颈挛缩。
HoLEP术后梗阻缓解情况更好,需要再次留置导尿管或再次手术的患者更少,尽管更多患者报告有早期术后压力性尿失禁。导尿管留置时间、住院时间和围手术期发病率相似。对于前列腺较小的患者,HoBNI和HoLEP作为门诊手术是安全可行的,但HoBNI的手术操作更快。