Teixeira Marcus Zulian, Lin Chin An, Martins Milton de Arruda
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2005 Mar 2;123(2):77-82. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802005000200009. Epub 2005 Jun 8.
Homeopathy and acupuncture, although recognized as medical specializations in Brazil, are not taught in most medical schools. The objective was to evaluate undergraduate attitudes towards them following their inclusion as optional disciplines at Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) in 2002.
Questionnaire, at FMUSP.
484 students answered a self-administered questionnaire on these therapies, regarding their interest in learning, the teaching methods, their knowledge/experience (or that of someone close to them) and how it was acquired, the main indicators and general effectiveness of these therapies, and the possibilities for offering and integrating them within public healthcare units.
Over 85% of the students considered that homeopathy and acupuncture should be included in curricula, as options (72%) or compulsorily (19%); 56% showed great interest in learning about them. Although 76% had little or no knowledge, 67% believed that these therapies had some effectiveness, and that chronic diseases (37%) or even chronic and acute diseases (29%) would be the main indicators for their use. Around 35% were receptive towards offering public primary care using both therapies, while 34% thought these treatments should also be available in hospitals and 60% believed they could be integrated with conventional medical practices.
The medical students were interested in learning the principles of homeopathy and acupuncture, were able to observe and report on the effectiveness of these treatments and defended the use of these medical specializations within public healthcare.
顺势疗法和针灸在巴西虽被视为医学专业,但大多数医学院校并不教授。目的是评估2002年圣保罗大学医学院(FMUSP)将其列为选修科目后本科学生对它们的态度。
在FMUSP进行问卷调查。
484名学生回答了一份关于这些疗法的自填式问卷,内容涉及他们的学习兴趣、教学方法、他们自己(或其身边人)的知识/经验及其获取途径、这些疗法的主要指标和总体疗效,以及在公共卫生保健单位提供和整合这些疗法的可能性。
超过85%的学生认为顺势疗法和针灸应纳入课程,作为选修(72%)或必修(19%);56%的学生对学习它们表现出极大兴趣。尽管76%的学生几乎没有相关知识,但67%的学生认为这些疗法有一定疗效,且慢性病(37%)甚至慢性和急性病(29%)将是使用这些疗法的主要指征。约35%的学生接受在公共初级保健中使用这两种疗法,34%的学生认为医院也应提供这些治疗,60%的学生认为它们可与传统医疗实践相结合。
医学生对学习顺势疗法和针灸的原理感兴趣,能够观察并报告这些治疗的疗效,并支持在公共卫生保健中使用这些医学专业。