• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物膜与抗生素治疗:新型药物递送系统在对抗细菌耐药性方面是否发挥作用?

Biofilms and antibiotic therapy: is there a role for combating bacterial resistance by the use of novel drug delivery systems?

作者信息

Smith Anthony W

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005 Jul 29;57(10):1539-50. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.04.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2005.04.007
PMID:15950314
Abstract

The conventional view of antibiotic resistance is one where bacteria exhibit significantly reduced susceptibility to antimicrobials in laboratory tests by mechanisms such as altered drug uptake, altered drug target and drug inactivation. Whilst these mechanisms undoubtedly make a major contribution to antibiotic failure in the clinic, the phenomenon of clinical failure in spite of sensitivity in laboratory tests is also well recognised. It is in this context that attention has focussed on bacteria growing as adherent biofilms, not only as the mode of growth of device-related infections associated for example with artificial joints and venous catheters, but also with other chronic infections such as those occurring in the respiratory tract. Growth as a biofilm almost always leads to a significant decrease in susceptibility to antimicrobial agents compared with cultures grown in suspension and, whilst there is no generally agreed mechanism for the resistance of biofilm bacteria, it is largely phenotypic. That is, when biofilm bacteria are grown in conventional laboratory suspension culture they become susceptible to antimicrobials. A number of elements in the process of biofilm formation have been studied as targets for novel drug delivery technologies. These include surface modification of devices to reduce bacterial attachment and biofilm development as well as incorporation of antimicrobials-again to prevent colonisation. Electrical approaches have been used either to release antimicrobials from device surfaces or to drive antimicrobials through the biofilm. Other technologies not specifically focussed on biofilms include aerosolized delivery of antibiotics to the lung and formulation into liposome and polymer-based vehicles. Liposomal systems have been widely studied, either to target antibiotics to the surface of bacterial biofilms, or by virtue of their property of being taken up cells of the reticuloendothelial system, to target antibiotics towards intracellular bacteria. Many polymer-based carrier systems have also been proposed, including those based on biodegradable polymers such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) as well as thermoreversible hydrogels. Their contribution to the prevention or resolution of infection is reviewed.

摘要

对抗生素耐药性的传统观点认为,在实验室测试中,细菌通过改变药物摄取、改变药物靶点和药物失活等机制,对抗微生物药物的敏感性显著降低。虽然这些机制无疑是导致临床抗生素治疗失败的主要原因,但尽管在实验室测试中显示敏感,临床上仍出现治疗失败的现象也广为人知。正是在这种背景下,人们将注意力集中在以附着生物膜形式生长的细菌上,这不仅是与人工关节和静脉导管等相关的器械相关感染的生长模式,也是其他慢性感染(如呼吸道感染)的生长模式。与悬浮培养的细菌相比,以生物膜形式生长几乎总是导致对抗菌剂的敏感性显著降低,虽然对于生物膜细菌耐药性尚无普遍认可的机制,但很大程度上是表型耐药。也就是说,当生物膜细菌在传统实验室悬浮培养中生长时,它们会变得对抗菌药物敏感。生物膜形成过程中的一些因素已作为新型药物递送技术的靶点进行了研究。这些因素包括对器械进行表面改性以减少细菌附着和生物膜形成,以及加入抗菌剂——同样是为了防止细菌定植。已采用电学方法从器械表面释放抗菌剂或促使抗菌剂穿透生物膜。其他并非专门针对生物膜的技术包括将抗生素雾化递送至肺部以及制成脂质体和聚合物载体。脂质体系统已得到广泛研究,要么将抗生素靶向细菌生物膜表面,要么凭借其被网状内皮系统细胞摄取的特性,将抗生素靶向细胞内细菌。还提出了许多基于聚合物的载体系统,包括基于聚(丙交酯 - 乙交酯)等可生物降解聚合物以及热可逆水凝胶的载体系统。本文综述了它们在预防或解决感染方面的作用。

相似文献

1
Biofilms and antibiotic therapy: is there a role for combating bacterial resistance by the use of novel drug delivery systems?生物膜与抗生素治疗:新型药物递送系统在对抗细菌耐药性方面是否发挥作用?
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005 Jul 29;57(10):1539-50. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.04.007.
2
Biofilms in vitro and in vivo: do singular mechanisms imply cross-resistance?生物膜的体外和体内研究:单一机制是否意味着交叉耐药?
J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92 Suppl:98S-110S.
3
The potential of lipid- and polymer-based drug delivery carriers for eradicating biofilm consortia on device-related nosocomial infections.基于脂质和聚合物的药物递送载体在根除与器械相关的医院感染中的生物膜群落方面的潜力。
J Control Release. 2008 May 22;128(1):2-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
4
The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections.治疗生物膜相关细菌感染的挑战。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Aug;82(2):204-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100247. Epub 2007 May 30.
5
Biofilms in vitro and in vivo: do singular mechanisms imply cross-resistance?生物膜的体外和体内研究:单一机制是否意味着交叉耐药?
Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol. 2002(31):98S-110S.
6
[Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].[抗结核药物的研发:现状与未来前景]
Kekkaku. 2006 Dec;81(12):753-74.
7
A retrospective analysis of biofilm antibiotic susceptibility testing: a better predictor of clinical response in cystic fibrosis exacerbations.生物膜抗生素敏感性测试的回顾性分析:囊性纤维化急性加重期临床反应的更好预测指标
J Cyst Fibros. 2009 Mar;8(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
8
Needed, new paradigms in antibiotic development.需要在抗生素开发中引入新的范例。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Jun;11(8):1233-7. doi: 10.1517/14656561003724747.
9
Effect of antibacterials on biofilms.抗菌药物对生物被膜的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):S175.e9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.002.
10
Biofilms--a neglected antibacterial target?生物膜——一个被忽视的抗菌靶点?
Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2007 Aug;8(8):598-9.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro assessment of berberine-loaded carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel: A promising antimicrobial candidate for S. aureus-induced bovine mastitis treatment.载黄连素羧甲基壳聚糖水凝胶的体外评估:一种用于治疗金黄色葡萄球菌引起的牛乳腺炎的有前景的抗菌候选物。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0326574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326574. eCollection 2025.
2
Antibiofilm effects of bacteriocin PCM7-4 on Listeria monocytogenes.细菌素PCM7-4对单核细胞增生李斯特菌的抗生物膜作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 5;20(6):e0325109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325109. eCollection 2025.
3
A macrophage-like biomimetic nanoparticle with high-efficiency biofilm disruption and innate immunity activation for implant-related infection therapy.
一种具有高效生物膜破坏和先天免疫激活功能的巨噬细胞样仿生纳米颗粒用于植入相关感染治疗。
Mater Today Bio. 2025 Feb 14;31:101575. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101575. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Exploring the photosensitizing potential of Nanoliposome Loaded Improved Toluidine Blue O (NLITBO) Against Streptococcus mutans: An in-vitro feasibility study.探索载改良甲苯胺蓝 O 的纳米脂质体(NLITBO)对变异链球菌的光敏潜力:一项体外可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 30;19(10):e0312521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312521. eCollection 2024.
5
Advanced Imaging Methodology in Bacterial Biofilms with a Fluorescent Enzymatic Sensor for pepN Activity.基于 pepN 活性的荧光酶传感器的细菌生物膜的高级成像方法。
Biosensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;14(9):424. doi: 10.3390/bios14090424.
6
The progress and future of the treatment of Candida albicans infections based on nanotechnology.基于纳米技术的白念珠菌感染治疗的进展与未来。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2024 Sep 16;22(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02841-6.
7
Nanoparticle-Based Strategies for Managing Biofilm Infections in Wounds: A Comprehensive Review.基于纳米颗粒的伤口生物膜感染管理策略:综述
ACS Omega. 2024 Jun 17;9(26):27853-27871. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c02343. eCollection 2024 Jul 2.
8
Anti-biofilm, drug delivery and cytotoxicity properties of dendrimers.树枝状大分子的抗生物膜、药物递送及细胞毒性特性
ADMET DMPK. 2024 Feb 14;12(2):239-267. doi: 10.5599/admet.1917. eCollection 2024.
9
Effective elimination of bacteria on hard surfaces by the combined use of bacteriophages and chemical disinfectants.通过噬菌体和化学消毒剂的联合使用,有效消除硬表面上的细菌。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Apr 2;12(4):e0379723. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03797-23. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
10
Phage Lytic Protein CHAPSH3b Encapsulated in Niosomes and Gelatine Films.包裹于非离子表面活性剂泡囊和明胶膜中的噬菌体裂解蛋白CHAPSH3b
Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 6;12(1):119. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010119.