Bouza Carmen, Muñoz Ana, Amate José María
Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Madrid, Spain.
Wound Repair Regen. 2005 May-Jun;13(3):218-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130302.x.
Healing of leg ulcers constitutes a major clinical problem. Local methods for accelerating the healing process include modern wound dressings, but it is unclear what impact these dressings have on ulcer healing. This study examines the collective evidence on the effectiveness of modern dressings in the treatment of leg ulcers. To this end, a meta-analysis was conducted covering randomized clinical trials identified following a systematic review of the literature in different databases. Estimates of effect were calculated according to the fixed effects model. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria (26 on ulcers of venous etiology, 5 on ulcers of mixed or poorly differentiated etiology). We found no study that exclusively addressed arterial ulcers. Although studies displayed considerable methodological limitations, analysis showed no significant differences in terms of the proportion of healed ulcers or reduction in wound size for both modern and conventional dressings. Similarly, no significant differences were observed between the different modern dressings compared in the studies. Thus, the current medical literature is poor in supporting the use of modern dressings to improve the healing rate of leg ulcers. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether the choice of any specific dressing type affects the healing course of these ulcers. Well-conducted trials are warranted to reliably address this question.
腿部溃疡的愈合是一个重大的临床问题。加速愈合过程的局部方法包括现代伤口敷料,但尚不清楚这些敷料对溃疡愈合有何影响。本研究考察了关于现代敷料治疗腿部溃疡有效性的综合证据。为此,进行了一项荟萃分析,涵盖了在对不同数据库中的文献进行系统评价后确定的随机临床试验。效应估计值根据固定效应模型计算。31项研究符合纳入标准(26项关于静脉性溃疡,5项关于混合性或低分化性溃疡)。我们未发现专门针对动脉性溃疡的研究。尽管研究显示出相当大的方法学局限性,但分析表明,现代敷料和传统敷料在愈合溃疡的比例或伤口大小的缩小方面无显著差异。同样,在研究中比较的不同现代敷料之间也未观察到显著差异。因此,当前医学文献在支持使用现代敷料提高腿部溃疡愈合率方面证据不足。没有足够的证据来确定选择任何特定的敷料类型是否会影响这些溃疡的愈合过程。需要进行精心设计的试验来可靠地解决这个问题。