Peters Michele, Abu-Saad Huda Huijer, Robbins Ian, Vydelingum Vasso, Dowson Andrew, Murphy Margaret
University of Surrey, European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
Headache. 2005 May;45(5):571-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05111.x.
Many strategies are available to treat and prevent migraine and chronic daily headache (CDH). Broadly these strategies can be divided into four groups, including (i) health care consultations, (ii) medication and alternative remedies, (iii) general (acute and prophylactic) strategies, and (iv) social support.
This study aimed to compare headache management between migraine (MO), migraine with aura (MA), and those with CDH over the last 12 months.
A postal questionnaire was sent to 887 members of the Migraine Action Association (MAA). The response rate was 60.5% (n=537), and 438 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Migraine (n=117) and MA (n=239) patients were classed according to the International Headache Society (IHS). CDH (n=82) was diagnosed when respondents had 15 or more headache days per month. Descriptive tests, analysis of variances (ANOVAs), chi2, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis (P<.05).
The three groups did not differ in age, gender, ethnicity, level of education, and employment status. Significant differences in management strategies between the groups were found in the number of respondents who had consulted headache specialists (P=.002) and neurologists (P=.004), the number and types of acute medications (eg, triptans, P=.002), the use of antidepressants (P=.004), and some acute and prophylactic avoidance techniques. Although, no significant differences between the groups were found in the use of other health professionals (eg, GP), alternative health professionals, general acute management, and the use of social support, they all actively used these strategies.
The respondents of this study were active users of management strategies that are based on a combination of health care consultations, medication and alternative remedies, general management, and social support. In comparison to previous findings, the respondents in this study frequently reported higher use of management strategies (such as the use of triptans), which may be related to this group of patients being better informed about headache management than those with headache within the general population. Thus, the findings may not be representative for the general population, but they give an indication of the influence and importance of headache-related education carried out by patient organizations such as the MAA.
有多种策略可用于治疗和预防偏头痛及慢性每日头痛(CDH)。大致而言,这些策略可分为四类,包括:(i)医疗保健咨询;(ii)药物及替代疗法;(iii)一般(急性和预防性)策略;(iv)社会支持。
本研究旨在比较偏头痛(MO)、有先兆偏头痛(MA)和CDH患者在过去12个月中的头痛管理情况。
向偏头痛行动协会(MAA)的887名成员发送了邮政问卷。回复率为60.5%(n = 537),438份问卷纳入分析。偏头痛(n = 117)和有先兆偏头痛(MA,n = 239)患者根据国际头痛协会(IHS)进行分类。当受访者每月头痛天数达到15天或更多时,诊断为CDH(n = 82)。采用描述性测试、方差分析(ANOVA)、卡方检验和Kruskal - Wallis检验进行统计分析(P <.05)。
三组在年龄、性别、种族、教育程度和就业状况方面无差异。在咨询头痛专科医生的受访者数量(P =.002)、咨询神经科医生的受访者数量(P =.004)、急性药物的数量和类型(如曲坦类药物,P =.002)、抗抑郁药的使用(P =.004)以及一些急性和预防性避免技巧方面,发现组间管理策略存在显著差异。尽管在使用其他医疗专业人员(如全科医生)、替代医疗专业人员、一般急性管理以及社会支持的使用方面,组间未发现显著差异,但他们都积极使用这些策略。
本研究的受访者积极使用基于医疗保健咨询、药物及替代疗法、一般管理和社会支持相结合的管理策略。与先前的研究结果相比,本研究中的受访者经常报告更高的管理策略使用率(如使用曲坦类药物),这可能与该组患者比普通人群中的头痛患者对头痛管理了解更多有关。因此,这些结果可能不代表普通人群,但它们表明了像MAA这样的患者组织开展的头痛相关教育的影响和重要性。