Khu J V, Siow H C, Ho K H
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Block S4, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543.
Singapore Med J. 2008 Oct;49(10):774-9.
We sought to determine the epidemiological features and the headache burden of headache patients in the Singapore primary care setting. Particular attention was given to the adequacy of migraine diagnosis and management as well as the utilisation of prophylactic medication by primary care doctors.
Consenting patients who consulted participating general practice clinics with the chief complaint of headache, were administered a questionnaire incorporating demographical data, headache characteristics and burden as well as treatment patterns. For each patient, the attending doctor independently completed a second questionnaire covering diagnosis and treatment of the patient.
A disproportionate number of non-Chinese and females presented for headache management in the primary care setting as compared to the Singapore population at large. Migraineurs had more headache-related disability (67.3 percent) than non-migraineurs (45.7 percent). In our study setting, the IHS diagnostic criteria (38.2 percent of respondents), ID migraine (61.1 percent) and physician's diagnosis (62.0 percent) correlated poorly with each other when employed for case definition of migraine. In the study population, 22.6 percent used acute pain medication excessively (more than four days a week), 39.3 percent were dissatisfied with their current treatment and 58.3 percent had frequent headaches (more than four attacks a month). Only a minority of those in whom prophylaxis was indicated were treated appropriately.
Diagnosis of migraine is inconsistent in the primary care setting despite the condition being responsible for considerable disability. Prophylactic treatment is underutilised as a management strategy, and the risk of medication-overuse headaches is underestimated. Our results emphasise the continuing need for education of primary care physicians and the public about strategies for effective headache diagnosis and treatment.
我们试图确定新加坡初级医疗环境中头痛患者的流行病学特征和头痛负担。特别关注偏头痛诊断和管理的充分性以及初级医疗医生对预防性药物的使用情况。
同意参与的以头痛为主诉就诊于参与研究的全科诊所的患者,接受了一份包含人口统计学数据、头痛特征与负担以及治疗模式的问卷。对于每位患者,主治医生独立完成一份涵盖患者诊断和治疗情况的第二份问卷。
与新加坡总体人群相比,在初级医疗环境中因头痛前来就诊的非华裔和女性比例过高。偏头痛患者比非偏头痛患者有更多与头痛相关的残疾(分别为67.3%和45.7%)。在我们的研究环境中,用于偏头痛病例定义时,国际头痛协会(IHS)诊断标准(38.2%的受访者)、ID偏头痛标准(61.1%)和医生诊断(62.0%)之间的相关性较差。在研究人群中,22.6%的人过度使用急性疼痛药物(每周超过四天),39.3%的人对当前治疗不满意,58.3%的人经常头痛(每月超过四次发作)。在需要预防性治疗的人群中,只有少数人得到了适当治疗。
尽管偏头痛导致了相当大的残疾,但在初级医疗环境中偏头痛的诊断并不一致。预防性治疗作为一种管理策略未得到充分利用,药物过度使用性头痛的风险被低估。我们的结果强调持续需要对初级医疗医生和公众进行有关有效头痛诊断和治疗策略的教育。