Suppr超能文献

意大利一家头痛诊所中偏头痛患者使用补充和替代医学(CAM)的患病率、模式及预测因素。

Prevalence, pattern and predictors of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in migraine patients attending a headache clinic in Italy.

作者信息

Rossi P, Di Lorenzo G, Malpezzi M G, Faroni J, Cesarino F, Di Lorenzo C, Nappi G

机构信息

Headache Clinic, INI Grottaferrata, University Centre for Adaptive Disorders and Headache, IRCCS C. Mondino Institute of Neurology and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2005 Jul;25(7):493-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.00898.x.

Abstract

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in migraine is a growing phenomenon about which little is known. This study was undertaken to evaluate the rates, pattern and presence of predictors of CAM use in a clinical population of patients with different migraine subtypes. Four hundred and eighty-one migraineurs attending a headache clinic were asked to undergo a physician-administered structured interview designed to gather information on CAM use. Past use of CAM therapies was reported by 31.4% of the patients surveyed, with 17.1% having used CAM in the previous year. CAM therapies were perceived as beneficial by 39.5% of the patients who had used them. A significantly higher proportion of transformed migraine patients reported CAM treatments as ineffective compared with patients suffering from episodic migraine (73.1% vs. 50.7%, P < 0.001). The most common source of a recommendation of CAM was a friend or relative (52.7%). In most cases, migraineurs' recourse to CAM treatments was specifically for their headache (89.3%). Approximately 61% of CAM users had not informed their medical doctors of their CAM use. The most common reason for deciding to try a CAM therapy was that it offered a 'potential improvement of headache' (47.7%). The greatest users of CAM treatments were: patients with a diagnosis of transformed migraine; those who had consulted a high number of specialists and reported a higher lifetime number of conventional medical visits; those with a comorbid psychiatric disorder; those with a high income; and those whose headache had been either misdiagnosed or not diagnosed at all. Our findings suggest that headache clinic migraine patients, in their need of and quest for care, seek and explore both conventional and CAM approaches. Physicians should be made aware of this patient-driven change in the medical climate in order to prevent misuse of healthcare resources and to be better equipped to meet patients' needs.

摘要

在偏头痛治疗中使用补充和替代医学(CAM)的现象日益普遍,但人们对此了解甚少。本研究旨在评估不同偏头痛亚型临床患者中CAM使用的发生率、模式及预测因素。对481名前往头痛门诊的偏头痛患者进行了由医生主导的结构化访谈,以收集有关CAM使用的信息。31.4%的受访患者报告过去使用过CAM疗法,其中17.1%在过去一年中使用过。39.5%使用过CAM疗法的患者认为其有益。与发作性偏头痛患者相比,转化型偏头痛患者报告CAM治疗无效的比例显著更高(73.1%对50.7%,P<0.001)。CAM推荐最常见的来源是朋友或亲戚(52.7%)。在大多数情况下,偏头痛患者采用CAM治疗专门是为了治疗头痛(89.3%)。约61%的CAM使用者未告知其医生自己使用CAM的情况。决定尝试CAM疗法最常见的原因是其“可能改善头痛”(47.7%)。CAM治疗的最大使用者包括:诊断为转化型偏头痛的患者;咨询过大量专家且报告终身传统医疗就诊次数较多的患者;患有共病精神障碍的患者;高收入患者;以及头痛曾被误诊或根本未被诊断的患者。我们的研究结果表明,头痛门诊的偏头痛患者在寻求和探索治疗时,既会采用传统方法,也会采用CAM方法。医生应意识到这种由患者驱动的医疗环境变化,以防止医疗资源的滥用,并更好地满足患者需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验