Rossi Paolo, Di Lorenzo Giorgio, Faroni Jessica, Malpezzi Maria G, Cesarino Francesco, Nappi Giuseppe
Headache Clinic, INI Grottaferrata, Grottaferrata, Italy.
Headache. 2006 Apr;46(4):622-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00412.x.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the rates, pattern, and presence of predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use in a clinical population of patients with chronic tension-type headache.
The use of complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of headaches is a growing phenomenon about which little is known.
A total of 110 chronic tension-type headache patients attending a headache clinic participated in a physician-administered structured interview designed to gather information on complementary and alternative medicine use.
Past use of complementary and alternative therapies was reported by 40% of the patients surveyed (22.7% in the previous year). Chronic tension-type headache patients prefer complementary and alternative practitioner-administered physical treatments to self-treatments, the most frequently used being chiropractic (21.9%), acupuncture (17.8%), and massage (17.8%). Only 41.1% of the patients perceived complementary and alternative therapies to be beneficial. The most common source of recommendation of complementary and alternative medicine was a friend or relative (41.1%). Most of the chronic tension-type headache patients used complementary and alternative treatment as a specific intervention for their headache (77.3%). Almost 60% of complementary and alternative medicine users had not informed their medical doctors of their use of complementary and alternative medicine. The most common reasons given for choosing to use a complementary or alternative therapy was the "potential improvement of headache" it offered (45.4%). The patients who had used more complementary and alternative treatments were found to be those recording a higher lifetime number of visits to conventional medical doctors, those with a comorbid psychiatric disorder, those enjoying a higher (household) income, and those who had never tried a preventive pharmacological treatment.
Our findings suggest that headache-clinic chronic tension-type headache patients, in their need of and quest for care, seek and explore both conventional and complementary and alternative therapies, even if only 41.1% of them perceived complementary treatments as effective. Physicians should be made aware of this patient-driven change in the medical climate in order to prevent misuse of health care resources and to be better equipped to meet patients' care requirements.
本研究旨在评估慢性紧张型头痛临床患者使用补充和替代医学的比率、模式及预测因素。
补充和替代医学在头痛治疗中的应用日益普遍,但人们对此了解甚少。
共有110名在头痛诊所就诊的慢性紧张型头痛患者参与了由医生进行的结构化访谈,旨在收集补充和替代医学使用情况的信息。
40%的被调查患者报告过去使用过补充和替代疗法(前一年为22.7%)。慢性紧张型头痛患者更喜欢由补充和替代医学从业者实施的物理治疗而非自我治疗,最常用的是脊椎按摩疗法(21.9%)、针灸(17.8%)和按摩(17.8%)。只有41.1%的患者认为补充和替代疗法有益。补充和替代医学最常见的推荐来源是朋友或亲戚(41.1%)。大多数慢性紧张型头痛患者将补充和替代治疗作为针对其头痛问题的特定干预措施(77.3%)。近60%使用补充和替代医学的患者未告知其医生自己使用补充和替代医学的情况。选择使用补充或替代疗法最常见的原因是其能“潜在改善头痛”(45.4%)。发现使用更多补充和替代治疗的患者是那些到传统医生处就诊次数更多、患有共病精神障碍、家庭收入较高以及从未尝试过预防性药物治疗的患者。
我们的研究结果表明,头痛诊所的慢性紧张型头痛患者在寻求护理时,会寻找并探索传统疗法以及补充和替代疗法,即便只有41.1%的患者认为补充治疗有效。应让医生了解这种由患者推动的医疗环境变化,以防止医疗资源的滥用,并更好地满足患者的护理需求。