Mosavel Maghboeba, Simon Christian, van Stade Debbie, Buchbinder Mara
Center for Reducing Health Disparities, Case Western Reserve University and MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp Building, Rm 213A, Cleveland, OH 44109 1998, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.041. Epub 2005 Jun 13.
Community engagement is an on-going, arduous, and necessary process for developing effective health promotion programs. The challenges are amplified when the particular health issue or research question is not prominent in the consciousness of the targeted community. In this paper, we explore the community-based participatory research (CBPR) model as a means to negotiate a mutual agenda between communities and researchers. The paper is focused on the (perceived) need for cervical cancer screening in an under-resourced community in Cape Town, South Africa. Cervical cancer is a significant health problem in this community and elsewhere in South Africa. Unlike HIV-AIDS, however, many Black South Africans have not been educated about cervical cancer and the importance of obtaining screening. Many may not consider screening a priority in their lives. Our research included extensive consultations and informal interviews with diverse community and regional stakeholders. Following these, we conducted 27 focus groups and 106 demographic surveys with randomly selected youth, parents, local health care personnel, educators and school staff. Focus group data were summarized and analyzed cross-sectionally. Community stakeholders were involved throughout this research. Our consultations, interviews, and focus group data were key in identifying the concerns and priorities of the community. By engaging community stakeholders, we developed a research framework that incorporated the community's concerns and priorities, and stressed the intersecting roles of poverty, violence, and other cultural forces in shaping community members' health and wellbeing. Community members helped to refocus our research from cervical cancer to 'cervical health,' a concept that acknowledged the impact on women's bodies and lives of HIV-AIDS and STDs, sexual violence, poverty, and multiple social problems. We conclude that the research agenda and questions in community-based health research should not be considered immutable. They need to be open to negotiation, creativity, and constant reinvention.
社区参与是制定有效的健康促进计划的一个持续、艰巨且必要的过程。当特定的健康问题或研究问题在目标社区的意识中不突出时,挑战就会加剧。在本文中,我们探讨了基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)模型,作为在社区和研究人员之间协商共同议程的一种手段。本文重点关注南非开普敦一个资源匮乏社区对宫颈癌筛查的(感知)需求。宫颈癌在这个社区以及南非其他地区都是一个重大的健康问题。然而,与艾滋病毒/艾滋病不同的是,许多南非黑人没有接受过关于宫颈癌及其筛查重要性的教育。许多人可能不认为筛查是他们生活中的优先事项。我们的研究包括与不同的社区和地区利益相关者进行广泛的磋商和非正式访谈。在此之后,我们对随机挑选的青年、家长、当地医护人员、教育工作者和学校工作人员进行了27个焦点小组讨论和106次人口统计调查。焦点小组数据进行了横断面总结和分析。社区利益相关者参与了整个研究过程。我们的磋商、访谈和焦点小组数据对于确定社区的关注点和优先事项至关重要。通过让社区利益相关者参与,我们制定了一个研究框架,该框架纳入了社区的关注点和优先事项,并强调了贫困、暴力和其他文化力量在塑造社区成员健康和福祉方面的交叉作用。社区成员帮助我们将研究重点从宫颈癌重新聚焦到“宫颈健康”,这一概念承认了艾滋病毒/艾滋病和性传播疾病、性暴力、贫困以及多种社会问题对女性身体和生活的影响。我们得出结论,基于社区的健康研究中的研究议程和问题不应被视为一成不变的。它们需要接受协商、创新和不断重塑。