Mounier L, Veissier I, Boissy A
URH-ACS, INRA de Theix, 63122 Saint Genes Champanelles, France.
J Anim Sci. 2005 Jul;83(7):1696-704. doi: 10.2527/2005.8371696x.
In some production settings, beef bulls are mixed at the beginning of the finishing period to obtain homogeneous groups to facilitate finishing and to produce more homogeneous carcasses. Given the stress induced by mixing, we questioned whether this practice was profitable. Sixty-four young bulls were finished in groups of four over 8 mo. They were either mixed or unmixed and had either homogeneous vs. heterogeneous BW at the beginning of finishing. Behavioral traits (social behavior following mixing and general activities during the finishing period), stress measurements (cortisol concentration, adrenal weight, catecholamine-synthesizing enzyme activity, and pain sensitivity), and production traits (growth rate, homogeneity, feed efficiency, and carcass measurements) were evaluated. Bulls reacted to the mixing with increased frequency of social interactions (agonistic interactions: 17.9 in mixed vs. 1.2 in unmixed bulls, P < 0.001; sexual interactions: 9.6 vs. 1.7, P < 0.001; nonagonistic interactions: 5.25 vs. 3.1, P < 0.05). Agonistic and sexual interactions were more frequent between bulls of homogeneous BW (P < 0.05). Throughout the finishing period, the synchronization of activity tended to be lower between mixed bulls (P = 0.09). At slaughter, the activity of tyrosine hydroxylase, a catecholamine-synthesizing enzyme, was increased in mixed bulls (1.52 vs. 1.16 nmol.h(-1).mg(-1), P < 0.05), which may indicate chronic stress. No differences were noted in ADG or carcass traits among treatments. The variability of BW within groups increased in groups that were initially homogeneous, whereas it decreased in groups that were initially heterogeneous. In conclusion, mixing young beef bulls at the beginning of the finishing period did not have detrimental effects on health and production, but mixing induced stress, perhaps due to decreased cohesion within groups. Thus, we failed to confirm the proposed benefit of mixing bulls to homogenize their BW at the onset of finishing because BW homogeneity within groups was not maintained throughout the finishing period.
在一些生产环境中,育肥期开始时将肉用公牛混群,以形成同质群体,便于育肥并生产出更均匀的胴体。考虑到混群会产生应激,我们质疑这种做法是否有利可图。64头年轻公牛以每组4头的方式育肥8个月。它们在育肥开始时要么混群要么不混群,且体重要么同质要么异质。对行为特征(混群后的社会行为以及育肥期的一般活动)、应激指标(皮质醇浓度、肾上腺重量、儿茶酚胺合成酶活性和疼痛敏感性)以及生产性状(生长速度、同质性、饲料效率和胴体指标)进行了评估。公牛对混群的反应是社交互动频率增加(争斗性互动:混群公牛为17.9次,不混群公牛为1.2次,P<0.001;性行为互动:9.6次对1.7次,P<0.001;非争斗性互动:5.25次对3.1次,P<0.05)。体重同质的公牛之间争斗性和性行为互动更频繁(P<0.05)。在整个育肥期,混群公牛之间的活动同步性往往较低(P = 0.09)。屠宰时,混群公牛中儿茶酚胺合成酶酪氨酸羟化酶的活性增加(1.52对1.16 nmol·h⁻¹·mg⁻¹,P<0.05),这可能表明存在慢性应激。各处理组间的平均日增重或胴体性状没有差异。最初体重同质的组内体重变异性增加,而最初体重异质的组内体重变异性降低。总之,育肥期开始时混群年轻肉用公牛对健康和生产没有不利影响,但混群会引发应激,可能是由于群体内凝聚力下降。因此,我们未能证实混群公牛在育肥开始时使体重均匀化的预期益处,因为在整个育肥期内群体内体重均匀性并未得到维持。