Seçil Mustafa, Altay Canan, Gülcü Aytaç, Ceçe Hasan, Göktay Ahmet Yiğit, Dicle Oğuz
Department of Radiology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005 Jun;11(2):105-8.
Intima-media thickness (IMT) has been proposed to be a morphological criterion of atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interobserver variability of manual and also of computer software measurements of IMT.
High-resolution common carotid artery (CCA) images of 88 patients that have been obtained by a linear broadband L5-12 MHz transducer and archived in PACS were retrospectively evaluated. Two separate investigators, who were unaware of the former results, evaluated the same images by using computer software that had a dedicated tool for automatic measurement of IMT. The results of the investigators were compared.
According to the two investigators who have performed manual measurements, mean values of IMT of right CCA were 0.6396 mm and 0.6356 mm; of the left CCA were 0.6662 mm and 0.6575 mm, respectively. The interobserver variability of measurements revealed the mean IMT as 0.6071 mm and 0.6048 mm for the right, 0.6216 mm and 0.6227 mm for the left CCA. Manual measurements of both investigators were found to be higher than the automatic measurements and the differences were statistically significant. Interobserver correlation of manual measurements was between 0.80-0.88 and of the automated measurements was between 0.93-0.98.
Manual measurements reveal higher values than the automated measurements of IMT. The interobserver correlation of automated measurements is higher than manual measurements. The use of dedicated software may be proposed to reduce the measurement errors.
内膜中层厚度(IMT)已被提议作为动脉粥样硬化的形态学标准。本研究的目的是调查IMT手动测量以及计算机软件测量的观察者间变异性。
回顾性评估了88例患者的高分辨率颈总动脉(CCA)图像,这些图像由线性宽带L5 - 12 MHz换能器获取并存储在PACS中。两名互不了解先前结果的独立研究者,使用具有IMT自动测量专用工具的计算机软件对相同图像进行评估。比较研究者的结果。
根据进行手动测量的两名研究者,右侧CCA的IMT平均值分别为0.6396 mm和0.6356 mm;左侧CCA的分别为0.6662 mm和0.6575 mm。测量的观察者间变异性显示,右侧CCA的平均IMT为0.6071 mm和0.6048 mm,左侧CCA为0.6216 mm和0.6227 mm。发现两名研究者的手动测量值均高于自动测量值,且差异具有统计学意义。手动测量的观察者间相关性在0.80 - 0.88之间,自动测量的在0.93 - 0.98之间。
手动测量显示的IMT值高于自动测量值。自动测量的观察者间相关性高于手动测量。可建议使用专用软件以减少测量误差。