Miller Bruce S, Taylor Brett, Widmann Roger F, Bae Donald S, Snyder Brian D, Waters Peter M
Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(4):490-4. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000158780.52849.39.
Thirty-four patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized study comparing cast immobilization alone versus percutaneous pin fixation following closed reduction of distal radial metaphyseal fractures. Patients older than 10 years of age with greater than 30 degrees of dorsal angulation or with complete fracture displacement were eligible for enrollment. Average follow-up was 10.5 weeks. All fractures healed uneventfully without deformity, growth arrest, or functional limitations. Overall complication rates were similar between groups. Thirty-nine percent of patients treated with casting had subsequent loss of reduction requiring remanipulation; there were no cases of loss of reduction in patients treated with pin fixation. Thirty-eight percent of patients treated with pin fixation had pin-related complications; all resolved following pin removal without long-term sequelae. Cost analysis showed no significant difference in treatment charges between groups. Treating surgeons should be aware of the potential short-term complications of each treatment method and adjust their postoperative care appropriately.
34例患者参与了一项前瞻性随机研究,该研究比较了单纯石膏固定与桡骨远端干骺端骨折闭合复位后经皮穿针固定的效果。年龄大于10岁、背侧成角大于30度或骨折完全移位的患者符合入组条件。平均随访时间为10.5周。所有骨折均顺利愈合,无畸形、生长停滞或功能受限。两组的总体并发症发生率相似。接受石膏固定治疗的患者中有39%随后出现复位丢失,需要再次手法复位;接受穿针固定治疗的患者中没有复位丢失的病例。接受穿针固定治疗的患者中有38%出现与针相关的并发症;所有并发症在拔针后均得到解决,无长期后遗症。成本分析显示两组治疗费用无显著差异。治疗外科医生应了解每种治疗方法的潜在短期并发症,并适当调整术后护理。