[From the biology of trauma to secondary preventive pharmalogical measures for post-traumatic stress disorders].

Of all the psychological complications that an individual is likely to present with when confronted with an exceptional event, the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is characterized by being progressive, frequent, invalidating, strongly associated with comorbidity, and having the tendency to become chronic if it is not detected clinically. By definition, it is threatening and produces an intense fear reaction. The traumatic event is a situation of extreme stress, not only capable of altering the physical and psychological homeostasis of the individual, but is also recognized as determinant in the aetiopathology of complications. The intensity of this distress can be identified clinically and physiologically, and is currently considered as an important risk factor for the development of PTSD later on, together with other pre-, peri- and post-traumatic factors. In fact, the most studied field is the therapeutic approach, in particular drug treatment, of the fully-constituted disorder, although this actually represents tertiary prevention. Even though primary prevention seems to concern Medicine very little, any prospect of performing secondary prevention should begin by rapid identification of the risk or vulnerability factors and should allow a population at risk from developing complications to be defined. Its potential therapeutic impact brings together psychotherapeutic and drug treatment, since it is only this combination that seems able to allow the most favourable clinical outcome to be achieved for an individual, who is confronted by an out-of-the-ordinary event. The aims of secondary prevention strategies are, for example, to reduce the incidence of acute PTSD in patients seen following the event. The benefits for the individual and for the society can easily be measured in terms of the consequences on his/her social, professional and family life, or in terms of cost. The usefulness of this prevention can also be measured by the possible ways that other conditions, comorbid to PTSD, are controlled, such as anxiety disorders, depression and substance abuse, for example. Secondary prevention strategies may also be aimed at determining the therapeutic impact, by preventing or moderating the appearance of an acute stress, or even by contributing in avoiding the onset of chronic PTSD. Psychopharmacology of the immediate and post-immediate disorders, however, remains a field which has been studied very little. Reduction or control of the high, prolonged level of hyperarousal phenomena or hypersensitization of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis, would contribute to the comfort of the individual, and would participate in the prevention of PTSD. Based on current knowledge of the neurobiology of trauma, we look into the existing and potential pharmacological possibilities. Even though benzodiazepines tend to have an important role, knowledge of other drugs and therapeutic groups is rapidly increasing. In this review, we will see that the efficacy of anti-adrenergic drugs and certain other anxiolytics is now well-documented, this opening the door to their use in the future. Other drug groups offer interesting, well-proven approaches, such as serotoninergic drugs, CRF or NPY antagonists, NMDA antagonists, anticonvulsants or other GABAergic agents. In view of this disorder, which represents a true public health problem, we consider that it is now possible to widen the horizons of our drug therapy, in combination with any necessary psychotherapeutic treatment, to reach the heart of the traumatic event, that often upsets the victims, both by the psychological suffering it induces, and the loss of his/her social, family and professional references and support structures.