Meijer Eline M, Sluiter Judith K, Frings-Dresen Monique H W
Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Amsterdam, Research Institute AmCOGG, The Netherlands.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005 Aug;78(7):523-32. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0622-x. Epub 2005 Jun 15.
This systematic review seeks to gain insight into the effectiveness of return-to-work treatment programs among sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints. The focus here lies on the composition of effective treatment programs, itemized for regional non-specific musculoskeletal complaints.
A systematic literature search was performed and methodological quality criteria were applied.
Eighteen high quality articles were selected, which reported on a combined total of 22 treatment programs, including a total of 3,579 participants. Of these 22 treatments programs, seven experimental treatments (32%) resulted in faster return to work compared to the control treatment. None of the studies reviewed reported negative findings. What appeared to be essential to effective treatment was knowledge conditioning, psychological, physical and work conditioning, possibly supplemented with relaxation exercises. Most of the high quality studies (64%) reported on a low back pain population.
The findings were inconsistent regarding the effectiveness of treatment programs in enabling sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal disorders to return to work. Except for low back pain, none of the studies explicitly itemized the effects of treatment programs on return to work by regional musculoskeletal disorders, such as upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.
本系统评价旨在深入了解针对非特异性肌肉骨骼疾病病假患者的重返工作岗位治疗方案的有效性。这里的重点是有效治疗方案的组成,按区域性非特异性肌肉骨骼疾病进行分类。
进行了系统的文献检索并应用了方法学质量标准。
选取了18篇高质量文章,这些文章共报道了22个治疗方案,涉及3579名参与者。在这22个治疗方案中,7个实验性治疗方案(32%)与对照治疗相比,能使患者更快重返工作岗位。所审查的研究均未报告负面结果。有效治疗的关键似乎是知识调节、心理、身体和工作调节,可能还辅以放松练习。大多数高质量研究(64%)报道的是腰痛患者群体。
关于治疗方案对非特异性肌肉骨骼疾病病假患者重返工作岗位的有效性,研究结果并不一致。除腰痛外,没有研究明确按区域性肌肉骨骼疾病(如上肢肌肉骨骼疾病)分类列出治疗方案对重返工作岗位的影响。