• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双再摄取抑制剂比选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂引发快速耐受性的几率更低:一项回顾性研究。

Dual reuptake inhibitors incur lower rates of tachyphylaxis than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Posternak Michael A, Zimmerman Mark

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, 02905, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;66(6):705-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0605.

DOI:10.4088/jcp.v66n0605
PMID:15960562
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The notion that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be associated with higher relapse rates than other antidepressants during maintenance treatment (tachyphylaxis) has been discussed for years, but to date there is little or no empirical evidence confirming this phenomenon. In this study, we systematically assessed prior anti-depressant treatment history in a cohort of depressed patients who presented for outpatient psychiatric treatment. Rates of tachyphylaxis were compared in venlafaxine and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), which act as dual reuptake inhibitors, versus SSRIs.

METHOD

237 patients who presented for treatment at the Rhode Island Hospital Department of Psychiatry's outpatient practice and were diagnosed with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were interviewed with the semistructured Treatment Response to Antidepressant Questionnaire. This cohort reported having undergone 326 prior SSRI trials, 47 prior venlafaxine trials, and 35 prior trials with a TCA. Rates of tachyphylaxis as a function of antidepressant class were compared.

RESULTS

Rates of tachyphylaxis were significantly lower (chi(2) = 6.77, df = 1, p = .01) with the dual reuptake inhibitors venlafaxine and TCAs (3 [3.7%] of 82) compared to rates of tachyphylaxis with SSRIs (46 [14.1%] of 326).

CONCLUSION

These results provide preliminary evidence that dual reuptake inhibitors may incur lower rates of tachyphylaxis than SSRIs. By virtue of the retrospective and non-random design of the study, these results warrant confirmation.

摘要

背景

关于选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)在维持治疗期间(快速减敏反应)可能比其他抗抑郁药有更高复发率的观点已讨论多年,但迄今为止几乎没有实证证据证实这一现象。在本研究中,我们系统评估了一组前来接受门诊精神科治疗的抑郁症患者之前的抗抑郁治疗史。比较了作为双重再摄取抑制剂的文拉法辛和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)与SSRIs的快速减敏反应发生率。

方法

对罗德岛医院精神科门诊前来治疗且被诊断为DSM-IV重度抑郁症的237名患者进行半结构化抗抑郁药治疗反应问卷调查。该队列报告之前进行过326次SSRI试验、47次文拉法辛试验和35次TCA试验。比较了作为抗抑郁药类别函数的快速减敏反应发生率。

结果

与SSRIs的快速减敏反应发生率(326次中有46次[14.1%])相比,双重再摄取抑制剂文拉法辛和TCAs的快速减敏反应发生率显著更低(χ² = 6.77,自由度 = 1,p = 0.01)(82次中有3次[3.7%])。

结论

这些结果提供了初步证据,表明双重再摄取抑制剂可能比SSRIs引起更低的快速减敏反应发生率。鉴于本研究的回顾性和非随机设计,这些结果有待证实。

相似文献

1
Dual reuptake inhibitors incur lower rates of tachyphylaxis than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a retrospective study.双再摄取抑制剂比选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂引发快速耐受性的几率更低:一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;66(6):705-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0605.
2
A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.急性重度抑郁症(MDD)的多国药物经济学评估:文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)的成本效益比较
Value Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;4(1):16-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001016.x.
3
The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.文拉法辛与其他抗抑郁药及安慰剂相比治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;259(3):172-85. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0849-0. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
4
Comparison of extended-release venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.缓释文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和三环类抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 1999 Feb;21(2):296-308. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88287-9.
5
Selective versus multi-transmitter antidepressants: are two mechanisms better than one?选择性与多递质抗抑郁药:两种机制是否优于一种?
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65 Suppl 4:37-45.
6
Mechanism of action of antidepressants.抗抑郁药的作用机制。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2002 Summer;36 Suppl 2:123-32.
7
Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.与传统选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及文拉法辛缓释剂相比,艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006 Mar;31(2):122-31.
8
Medical resource use and cost of venlafaxine or tricyclic antidepressant therapy. Following selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy for depression.文拉法辛或三环类抗抑郁药治疗的医疗资源使用情况及成本。在接受选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗抑郁症之后。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 May;15(5):495-505. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915050-00007.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine versus specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of published studies.文拉法辛与特异性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效和耐受性:已发表研究的荟萃分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32834ce13f.
10
One-year costs of second-line therapies for depression.抑郁症二线治疗的一年成本。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;61(4):290-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0409.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroprotective actions of norepinephrine in neurological diseases.去甲肾上腺素在神经疾病中的神经保护作用。
Pflugers Arch. 2024 Nov;476(11):1703-1725. doi: 10.1007/s00424-024-02999-w. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Failure to Respond after Reinstatement of Antidepressant Medication: A Systematic Review.抗抑郁药停药后无反应:系统评价。
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(5):268-275. doi: 10.1159/000491550. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
3
Effective Vortioxetine Dose Varies with Extent of Antidepressant Use Across Countries.伏硫西汀的有效剂量因各国抗抑郁药物使用程度而异。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2018 Jan 15;48(1):26-39.
4
Step-wise loss of antidepressant effectiveness with repeated antidepressant trials in bipolar II depression.在双相II型抑郁症中,反复进行抗抑郁药物试验会导致抗抑郁效果逐步丧失。
Bipolar Disord. 2016 Nov;18(7):563-570. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12442. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Synergistic regulation of glutamatergic transmission by serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in prefrontal cortical neurons.5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂协同调节前额皮质神经元中的谷氨酸能传递。
J Biol Chem. 2014 Sep 5;289(36):25177-85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.567610. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
6
A neurobiological hypothesis of treatment-resistant depression - mechanisms for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor non-efficacy.难治性抑郁症的神经生物学假说——选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无效的机制
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 May 20;8:189. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00189. eCollection 2014.
7
Identification and treatment of antidepressant tachyphylaxis.抗抑郁药快速耐受性的识别与治疗。
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar;11(3-4):24-8.
8
Assessing rates and predictors of tachyphylaxis during the prevention of recurrent episodes of depression with venlafaxine ER for two years (PREVENT) study.在使用缓释文拉法辛预防抑郁症复发两年的研究(PREVENT)中评估快速耐受性的发生率及预测因素。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2009;42(3):5-20.
9
Folate augmentation of treatment - evaluation for depression (FolATED): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.叶酸强化治疗抑郁症评估(FolATED):一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Nov 15;7:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-65.