Suppr超能文献

高级创伤生命支持课程中手术参与情况的分析。目标是什么,我们是否达成了这些目标?

Analysis of surgical participation in the Advanced Trauma Life Support course. What are the goals and are we meeting them?

作者信息

Esposito T J, Copass M K, Maier R V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1992 Jun;127(6):721-5; discussion 726. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420060101015.

Abstract

Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course records spanning 4 years were examined and American College of Surgeons members in Washington State surveyed to gain further information on ATLS course participants, skills utilization, and hospital credentialing. Thirty-seven (9.7%) of 382 course participants were trained general surgeons, 56 (14.7%) were surgical residents, and 12 (3.1%) were surgical specialists. One hundred thirty-six (35.6%) of the participants were primary care physicians and 115 (30.1%) were emergency physicians. Surgical residents, primary care physicians, and emergency physicians tended to be overrepresented in ATLS courses in comparison with their general distribution. Fully trained surgeons and surgical specialists were underrepresented. Course participants represented 3.8% of all physicians involved in patient care in the state. Only 6.4% of all active general surgeons in the state were participants, while 39% of active emergency physicians participated. The successful completion rate was 94% (98% for surgeons and 92% for nonsurgical physicians). Thirty-one percent of all American College of Surgeons survey respondents (31% of urban practitioners and 21% of rural practitioners) reported current ATLS qualification. Advanced Trauma Life Support qualification was reported by 31% of respondents as a requirement for taking trauma/emergency department call. Surgeons with a preference not to treat patients with trauma were less likely to have ATLS qualification. More than half of those who reported ATLS qualification had not performed a tracheal intubation, cricothyroidotomy, pericardiocentesis, or emergency department thoracotomy in the previous year. Participation of surgeons in ATLS courses is low, particularly among rural practitioners. Impetus for participation appears related to requirements for hospital staff credentialing and preferences for treating patients with trauma. Performance of procedures taught in the course is rare. Strategies to increase participation need to be formulated and implemented.

摘要

对4年期间的高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)课程记录进行了审查,并对华盛顿州的美国外科医师学会成员进行了调查,以获取有关ATLS课程参与者、技能使用情况和医院资格认证的更多信息。382名课程参与者中有37名(9.7%)是普通外科医生,56名(14.7%)是外科住院医师,12名(3.1%)是外科专科医生。136名(35.6%)参与者是初级保健医生,115名(30.1%)是急诊医生。与他们的总体分布相比,外科住院医师、初级保健医生和急诊医生在ATLS课程中的占比往往过高。经过充分培训的外科医生和外科专科医生占比过低。课程参与者占该州所有参与患者护理的医生的3.8%。该州所有在职普通外科医生中只有6.4%是参与者,而在职急诊医生中有39%参与了课程。成功率为94%(外科医生为98%,非外科医生为92%)。美国外科医师学会所有调查受访者中有31%(城市从业者中的31%和农村从业者中的21%)报告目前具有ATLS资格。31%的受访者报告说,ATLS资格是承担创伤/急诊科值班的一项要求。不愿治疗创伤患者的外科医生获得ATLS资格的可能性较小。报告具有ATLS资格的人中,超过一半在前一年没有进行过气管插管、环甲膜切开术、心包穿刺术或急诊科开胸手术。外科医生参加ATLS课程的比例较低,尤其是在农村从业者中。参与的动力似乎与医院工作人员资格认证的要求以及治疗创伤患者的偏好有关。课程中教授的操作很少有人进行。需要制定并实施提高参与度的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验