Esmaillzadeh Ahmad, Mirmiran Parvin, Moeini Siamak Habibi, Azizi Fereidoun
Endocrine Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 19395-4763, Tehran, I.R. Iran.
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 14;108(3):338-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.05.019. Epub 2005 Jun 15.
It has been suggested that health professionals may discard measurement of hip circumference from public health screening efforts. Before discarding the hip circumference in epidemiological surveys, it is important to consider whether any important information is likely to be lost.
To evaluate the relationship between hip circumference and metabolic risk factors in an urban adult population of Tehranian women.
In this population-based cross-sectional study, a representative sample of 5720 women aged 18-74 years, were included. Demographic data was collected; anthropometric indices and blood pressure were measured according to standard protocol. Hypertension was defined based on Joint National Committee VI (JNC VI). Biochemical analysis was conducted on fasting blood samples. Diabetes was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > or =126 mg/dl or 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG) > or =200 mg/dl. Lipid disorders and components of metabolic syndrome were considered based on Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III).
Mean age of women was 39.9+/-14.6 years. Mean body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, waist and hip circumferences for subjects were 27.1+/-5.1 kg/m2, 0.83+/-0.08, 86.5+/-13.1 cm and 103.5+/-9.8 cm, respectively. Higher hip circumference was associated with lower levels of serum total- and LDL-cholesterol, serum triglyceride, fasting plasma glucose, 2-h plasma glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Subjects in the top quintile of hip circumference had higher values of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration compared to those in the lower category. After adjustment for potential confounding variables and anthropometric measures associated with higher hip circumference, a significant decreasing trend was observed for odds of having high LDL-cholesterol (odds ratios among quintiles: 1.00, 0.98, 0.97, 0.95, 0.84, respectively, P for trend=0.04), diabetes (1.00, 0.68, 0.58, 0.45, 0.42, P for trend=0.01), hypertension (1.00, 0.96, 0.82, 0.78, 0.70, P for trend 0.02), low serum HDL-cholesterol (1.00, 1.03, 0.86, 0.82, 0.56, P for trend=0.04), elevated blood pressure (1.00, 0.99, 0.82, 0.70, 0.61, P for trend=0.01) and abnormal glucose homeostasis (1.00, 0.69, 0.66, 0.54, 0.48, P for trend=0.01) among hip circumference quintile categories. Individuals in the upper category of hip circumference had lower odds of having hypercholestrolemia (0.86 vs. 1.00) and high serum triglyceride levels (0.74 vs. 1.00) compared to those in the lowest category.
Hip circumference is independently and inversely associated with metabolic risk factors. This study underscores the importance of continuing to measure hip circumference in epidemiologic surveys in Tehranian adult women.
有人建议,卫生专业人员可能会在公共卫生筛查工作中放弃测量臀围。在流行病学调查中放弃测量臀围之前,重要的是要考虑是否可能会丢失任何重要信息。
评估德黑兰成年女性城市人群中臀围与代谢危险因素之间的关系。
在这项基于人群的横断面研究中,纳入了5720名年龄在18 - 74岁的具有代表性的女性样本。收集了人口统计学数据;根据标准方案测量了人体测量指标和血压。高血压根据美国国家联合委员会第六版(JNC VI)进行定义。对空腹血样进行了生化分析。糖尿病定义为空腹血糖(FPG)≥126 mg/dl或餐后2小时血糖(2hPG)≥200 mg/dl。根据成人治疗小组第三次报告(ATP III)考虑脂质紊乱和代谢综合征的组成部分。
女性的平均年龄为39.9±14.6岁。受试者的平均体重指数、腰臀比、腰围和臀围分别为27.1±5.1 kg/m²、0.83±0.08、86.5±13.1 cm和103.5±9.8 cm。较高的臀围与较低的血清总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平、血清甘油三酯、空腹血糖、餐后2小时血糖、收缩压和舒张压相关。臀围处于最高五分位数的受试者与较低类别受试者相比,血清高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度较高。在对与较高臀围相关的潜在混杂变量和人体测量指标进行调整后,观察到高LDL - 胆固醇(五分位数间的比值比分别为:1.00、0.98、0.97、0.95、0.84,趋势P值 = 0.04)、糖尿病(1.00、0.68、0.58、0.45、0.42,趋势P值 = 0.01)、高血压(1.00、0.96、0.82、0.78、0.70,趋势P值0.02)、低血清HDL - 胆固醇(1.00、1.03、0.86、0.82、0.56,趋势P值 = 0.04)、血压升高(1.00、0.99、0.82、0.70、0.61,趋势P值 = 0.01)和葡萄糖稳态异常(1.00、0.69、0.66、0.54、0.48,趋势P值 = 0.01)在臀围五分位数类别中的发生几率有显著下降趋势。与最低类别相比,臀围处于较高类别的个体患高胆固醇血症(0.86对1.00)和高血清甘油三酯水平(0.74对1.00)的几率较低。
臀围与代谢危险因素独立且呈负相关。本研究强调了在德黑兰成年女性的流行病学调查中继续测量臀围的重要性。