Pachulski Roman, Sabbour Hani, Gupta Rakesh, Adkins Danielle, Mirza Humair, Cone Jesse
Alamo Heart Associates, San Antonio, Texas.
J Interv Cardiol. 2005 Jun;18(3):185-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2005.04048.x.
2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) is a tissue adhesive developed for skin laceration closure that has not been previously evaluated for cardiac device implant wound closure. We reviewed 460 consecutive device implants with 475 incisions between November 1993 and May 2001. From November 1993 to December 1998, all patients (n 335) had a 3-layer reabsorbable suture closure with the application of topical bacitracin and dressing material. They were advised to avoid exposure to moisture for 10 days. From January 1999 to May 2001, the superficial suture layer was replaced with 2-OCA (n=125). No topical bacitracin or dressing was applied and patients were allowed to shower within 72 hours. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to age (69 +/- 12 vs 70 +/- 13 years, P=NS), sex (59% vs 62% male, p=NS) or device type (77% vs 68% pacemakers/loop recorders, p=NS). All incisions were evaluated at 24 hours, 7-14 days, and 6-12 weeks postprocedure. The 2-OCA and suture groups did not differ significantly with respect to allergic reaction (0% vs 1.4%, P=NS), cellulitis (0% vs 0.9%, P=NS), and infection requiring explant (0.8% vs 0.3%, P=NS), respectively. Total adverse events occurred in 1 of 125 (0.8%) of the 2-OCA group versus 9 of 350 (2.6%) of the suture group (P=NS). In cardiac device implant closure 2-OCA obviated the need for topical antibiotics and dressing materials while facilitating wound care without increased complications.
2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯(2-OCA)是一种用于皮肤裂伤缝合的组织粘合剂,此前尚未用于心脏设备植入伤口的闭合。我们回顾了1993年11月至2001年5月期间连续进行的460例设备植入手术,共475处切口。1993年11月至1998年12月,所有患者(n = 335)均采用三层可吸收缝线缝合,并应用局部杆菌肽和敷料。建议他们10天内避免接触水分。1999年1月至2001年5月,浅表缝线层被2-OCA取代(n = 125)。未应用局部杆菌肽或敷料,患者在72小时内即可淋浴。两组在年龄(69±12岁 vs 70±13岁,P = 无显著差异)、性别(男性分别为59% vs 62%,p = 无显著差异)或设备类型(起搏器/环路记录器分别为77% vs 68%,p = 无显著差异)方面无显著差异。所有切口在术后24小时、7 - 14天和6 - 12周进行评估。2-OCA组和缝线组在过敏反应(0% vs 1.4%,P = 无显著差异)、蜂窝织炎(0% vs 0.9%,P = 无显著差异)以及需要取出植入物的感染(0.8% vs 0.3%,P = 无显著差异)方面均无显著差异。2-OCA组125例中有1例(0.8%)发生了总不良事件,而缝线组350例中有9例(2.6%)发生(P = 无显著差异)。在心脏设备植入闭合中,2-OCA无需局部使用抗生素和敷料,同时便于伤口护理且不增加并发症。