Hartling Lisa, McAlister Finlay A, Rowe Brian H, Ezekowitz Justin, Friesen Carol, Klassen Terry P
Capital Health Evidence-based Practice Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_2-200506211-00010.
The authors discuss 3 challenges in conducting and interpreting any systematic review that are particularly relevant for systematic reviews of therapeutic devices or surgical procedures: 1) inclusion or exclusion of grey literature, 2) the role of nonrandomized studies, and 3) issues in applying the results to clinical care that are unique to the surgical and therapeutic device literature. The authors also discuss empirical evidence related to these topics and illustrate how reviewers in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Evidence-based Practice Center program have dealt with these challenges in developing evidence reports for decision makers and clinicians about therapeutic devices or surgical procedures.
作者讨论了在开展和阐释任何系统评价时面临的3项挑战,这些挑战与治疗性设备或外科手术的系统评价尤为相关:1)灰色文献的纳入或排除;2)非随机研究的作用;3)将结果应用于临床护理时存在的、外科手术和治疗性设备文献所特有的问题。作者还讨论了与这些主题相关的实证证据,并举例说明了医疗保健研究与质量机构循证实践中心项目的评审人员在为决策者和临床医生撰写有关治疗性设备或外科手术的证据报告时是如何应对这些挑战的。