Frith L
Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 39B, UK.
Health Care Anal. 1999;7(2):139-51. doi: 10.1023/A:1009497307073.
The purpose of this paper is to consider the role that values play in priority setting through the use of EBP. It is important to be clear about the role of values at all levels of the decision making process. At one level, society as a whole has to make decisions about the kind of health provision that it wants. As is generally accepted, these priority setting questions cannot be answered by medical science alone but involve important judgements of value. However, as I hope to show values come into priority setting questions at another level, one not often explicitly recognised in much of the literature: that of the very definition of the effectiveness of treatments. This has important consequences for patient care. If we do not recognise that the effectiveness of a treatment involve subjective elements--a patient's own assessment of the value of the treatment--then this could lead to the belief that we can purchase one treatment that is the most effective for all patients. This might result in a detrimental reduction in the range of options that a patient is given with some patients not receiving the treatment that is most effective for them.
本文的目的是探讨价值观在通过循证实践进行优先级设定中所起的作用。明确价值观在决策过程各个层面所起的作用非常重要。在一个层面上,整个社会必须就其想要的医疗保健类型做出决策。人们普遍认为,这些优先级设定问题不能仅由医学科学来回答,而是涉及重要的价值判断。然而,正如我希望表明的那样,价值观在优先级设定问题中还会在另一个层面出现,这是在许多文献中不常被明确认识到的层面:即治疗效果的定义层面。这对患者护理具有重要影响。如果我们没有认识到治疗效果涉及主观因素——患者自身对治疗价值的评估——那么这可能会导致一种观念,即我们可以购买一种对所有患者都最有效的治疗方法。这可能会导致给予患者的选择范围出现有害的减少,一些患者得不到对他们最有效的治疗。