Attree Pamela
Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Jul;13(4):330-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00562.x.
From the outset, providing support for parents has been a key feature of New Labour's policy agenda, but 'good' parenting, and child health and well-being are often undermined by the stresses associated with poverty. Moreover, there may be a gap between policy aims, and the perceptions and motivations of those intended to benefit. Drawing on a systematic review of qualitative studies of low-income parents, the present paper explores their experiences of informal and formal support networks, considering their strengths and weaknesses in the context of poverty. Traditional systematic review methods were used to locate and critically appraise 12 UK qualitative studies, which took as their focus parents' subjective experiences of caring for children in impoverished circumstances. Meta-ethnographic methods were then used to produce a qualitative meta-synthesis of findings. Exploring the similarities and differences in parents' accounts across studies identified positive and negative aspects of social support as a resource for poor parents. The review suggests that naturally occurring support systems do provide both material and emotional help to parents, but that such support has certain inherent drawbacks. It is not universally available and, in some circumstances, carries negative associations for poor families. Low-income lone mothers in particular enjoy smaller support networks, and are more reliant on mutual support than those in two-parent families. Paradoxically, it is the most socially isolated women who are least willing to seek professional help. Overall, low-income parents' experiences of formal health and social welfare agencies are mixed, and not invariably positive. In conclusion, this paper suggests that formal support services have the potential to fill gaps in informal support systems for poor families, but only if these are provided in ways which are sensitive to their needs. Therefore, parents' perspectives are essential to informing service design, development and evaluation in health and social care.
从一开始,为父母提供支持就是新工党政策议程的一个关键特征,但“良好”的养育方式以及儿童的健康和幸福常常受到与贫困相关压力的破坏。此外,政策目标与那些预期受益者的认知和动机之间可能存在差距。本文借鉴对低收入父母定性研究的系统综述,探讨他们在非正式和正式支持网络方面的经历,同时考虑这些网络在贫困背景下的优势和劣势。采用传统的系统综述方法来查找并批判性地评估12项英国定性研究,这些研究聚焦于父母在贫困环境中照顾孩子的主观经历。然后运用元民族志方法对研究结果进行定性元综合分析。通过探究各项研究中父母叙述的异同,确定了社会支持作为贫困父母资源的积极和消极方面。该综述表明,自然形成的支持系统确实为父母提供了物质和情感帮助,但这种支持存在某些固有缺陷。它并非普遍可得,而且在某些情况下,对贫困家庭带有负面关联。特别是低收入单亲母亲的支持网络较小,并且比双亲家庭中的母亲更依赖相互支持。矛盾的是,社会孤立程度最高的女性最不愿意寻求专业帮助。总体而言,低收入父母对正式健康和社会福利机构的体验好坏参半,并非总是积极的。总之,本文表明正式支持服务有潜力填补贫困家庭非正式支持系统的空白,但前提是要以对其需求敏感的方式提供这些服务。因此,父母的观点对于为健康和社会护理服务的设计、发展及评估提供信息至关重要。