• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按需分配?预测瑞典某城市地区分配给老年受助者的市政居家护理服务量。

According to need? Predicting the amount of municipal home help allocated to elderly recipients in an urban area of Sweden.

作者信息

Meinow Bettina, Kåreholt Ingemar, Lagergren Mårten

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Jul;13(4):366-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00570.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00570.x
PMID:15969708
Abstract

Given the cutbacks which have been carried out in the Swedish welfare state despite the unchanged official policy of allocation of home help services according to needs, it is essential to evaluate the factors which guide the allocation of home help today. Whereas numerous studies have identified factors which predict entry into the home help system, the present paper concentrates on predictors of the amount of home help amongst those allocated assistance. Data were obtained from the population-based care and services section of the 2002 Swedish National Study of Aging and Care-Kungsholmen (SNAC-K). All home help recipients (> or = 65 years of age) living in an inner city district of Stockholm (Kungsholmen) were analysed with ordinary least squares regressions to identify predictors of the number of hours of home help (n = 943). Need indicators, i.e. dependency in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs), and cognitive impairment (Berger scale) were the strongest predictors of more hours of home help. The addition of sociodemographic (i.e. age, gender and income), environmental (i.e. informal care, housing adaptations and housing accessibility) and structural (i.e. variations in allocation decisions between one care manager and another) factors contributed only marginally to the explained variance. Hours of help entitlement increased slightly with greater age. Co-residing individuals were allocated significantly fewer home help hours than those living alone. Income and regular access to informal care were not significant predictors. The fact that services are provided according to need criteria does not necessarily mean that the provided services are adequate to meet needs. On the macro level, social policy decisions and available economic and manpower resources determine the allotment of municipal home help. However, this study in an urban sample suggests that, within the available resources, the amount of home help allocated is guided mainly by need indicators amongst those given assistance.

摘要

尽管瑞典官方仍维持根据需求分配居家护理服务的政策不变,但瑞典福利国家体系已进行了削减,因此评估当前指导居家护理分配的因素至关重要。尽管众多研究已确定了预测进入居家护理体系的因素,但本文着重关注在已获援助人群中,居家护理量的预测因素。数据取自2002年瑞典全国老龄化与护理—— Kungsholmen研究(SNAC-K)中基于人群的护理与服务部分。对所有居住在斯德哥尔摩市中心城区(Kungsholmen)的居家护理接受者(年龄≥65岁)进行普通最小二乘法回归分析,以确定居家护理时长的预测因素(n = 943)。需求指标,即日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)的依赖程度,以及认知障碍(伯杰量表)是居家护理时长增加的最强预测因素。社会人口统计学因素(即年龄、性别和收入)、环境因素(即非正式护理、住房改造和住房可达性)以及结构因素(即不同护理经理之间分配决策的差异)的加入,对解释方差的贡献仅微乎其微。居家护理时长随年龄增长略有增加。与他人同住的个体获得的居家护理时长显著少于独居者。收入和定期获得非正式护理并非显著的预测因素。根据需求标准提供服务这一事实并不一定意味着所提供的服务足以满足需求。在宏观层面,社会政策决策以及可用的经济和人力资源决定了市政居家护理的分配。然而,这项针对城市样本的研究表明,在可用资源范围内,分配的居家护理量主要由受助者的需求指标来指导。

相似文献

1
According to need? Predicting the amount of municipal home help allocated to elderly recipients in an urban area of Sweden.按需分配?预测瑞典某城市地区分配给老年受助者的市政居家护理服务量。
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Jul;13(4):366-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00570.x.
2
Functional ability and health complaints among older people with a combination of public and informal care vs. public care only.接受公共护理与非正式护理相结合的老年人与仅接受公共护理的老年人的功能能力和健康问题。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):136-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00549.x.
3
Quality of life among older people in Sweden receiving help from informal and/or formal helpers at home or in special accommodation.在瑞典,在家中或特殊住所接受非正式和/或正式帮助的老年人的生活质量。
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Nov;12(6):504-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00519.x.
4
Determinants and characteristics of help provision for elderly people living at home and in relation to quality of life.居家老年人获得帮助的决定因素、特点及其与生活质量的关系。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Dec;18(4):387-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00291.x.
5
Dementia and depressive symptoms as predictors of home help utilization among the oldest old: population-based study in an urban area of Sweden.痴呆和抑郁症状作为最年长者使用家庭护理服务的预测因素:瑞典城市地区的基于人群的研究
J Aging Health. 2004 Nov;16(5):641-68. doi: 10.1177/0898264304268586.
6
[Handicaps and needs of the elderly. A multifactor epidemiologic study under urban conditions].[老年人的残疾与需求。城市环境下的多因素流行病学研究]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1986 Nov 1;116(44):1524-42.
7
[Dependence and necessities of non-covered services for the elderly in a health sector of Zaragoza].[萨拉戈萨市卫生部门中老年人非覆盖服务的依赖性及必要性]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2002 May-Jun;76(3):215-26.
8
The amount of informal and formal care among non-demented and demented elderly persons-results from a Swedish population-based study.非痴呆和痴呆老年人的非正式和正式照护量——来自瑞典一项基于人群研究的结果
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;20(9):862-71. doi: 10.1002/gps.1371.
9
[Objective and subjective determinants in the benefits of home help services for the elderly].[居家护理服务对老年人益处的客观与主观决定因素]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996 Apr;44(2):163-72.
10
Can a publicly funded home care system successfully allocate service based on perceived need rather than socioeconomic status? A Canadian experience.一个由公共资金资助的家庭护理系统能否成功地根据感知到的需求而非社会经济地位来分配服务?加拿大的经验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Mar;15(2):108-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00672.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Willingness and influencing factors of old-age care mode selection among middle-aged and older adults in Henan Province, China.河南省中老年人选择老年照护模式的意愿及影响因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 18;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04559-w.
2
Length of the period with late life dependency: Does the age of onset make a difference?晚年依赖期的时长:发病年龄会有影响吗?
Eur J Ageing. 2023 Jul 1;20(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s10433-023-00777-8.
3
Impact of Sociodemographic Factors on Use of Formal Social Services in an Older Swedish Population.
社会人口因素对瑞典老年人群体使用正规社会服务的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912526.
4
Association Between Dynamic Trends of Functional Disability and Poverty Among People Aged 45 and Over.45 岁及以上人群功能障碍的动态趋势与贫困之间的关系。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 17;9:742385. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.742385. eCollection 2021.
5
Eldercare services for people with and without a dementia diagnosis: an analysis of Swedish registry data.有和没有痴呆诊断的老年人护理服务:对瑞典登记数据的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06891-6.
6
Factors associated with health-related quality of life and burden on relatives of older people with multi-morbidity: a dyadic data study.与多病老年人的健康相关生活质量及其亲属负担相关的因素:一项对偶数据研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01604-w.
7
Does COVID-2019 have an Impact on the Purchase Intention of Commercial Long-Term Care Insurance among the Elderly in China?新型冠状病毒肺炎对中国老年人商业长期护理保险购买意愿有影响吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 May 6;8(2):126. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020126.
8
Factors contributing to post-stroke health care utilization and costs, secondary results from the life after stroke (LAST) study.导致卒中后医疗保健利用和成本的因素,来自卒中后生活(LAST)研究的次要结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05158-w.
9
Factors Influencing Long-Term Care Service Needs among the Elderly Based on the Latest Anderson Model: A Case Study from the Middle and Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River.基于最新安德森模型的长江中上游地区老年人长期护理服务需求影响因素:一项案例研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Dec 3;7(4):157. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040157.
10
Fairness and Eligibility to Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Home Care for Older Europeans.长期护理的公平性与资格:对影响欧洲老年人家庭护理使用方面不平等和不公平的驱动因素的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101224.