喹硫平与锂盐单药治疗双相抑郁急性期成人患者的双盲、安慰剂对照研究(EMBOLDEN I)。
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine and lithium monotherapy in adults in the acute phase of bipolar depression (EMBOLDEN I).
机构信息
Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
出版信息
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;71(2):150-62. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04995gre. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine and lithium monotherapy with that of placebo for a major depressive episode in bipolar disorder.
METHOD
802 patients with DSM-IV-defined bipolar disorder (499 bipolar I, 303 bipolar II) were randomly allocated to quetiapine 300 mg/d (n = 265), quetiapine 600 mg/d (n = 268), lithium 600 to 1800 mg/d (n = 136), or placebo (n = 133) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was the change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The study was conducted from August 2005 to May 2007.
RESULTS
Mean MADRS total score change from baseline at week 8 was -15.4 for quetiapine 300 mg/d, -16.1 for quetiapine 600 mg/d, -13.6 for lithium, and -11.8 for placebo (P < .001 for both quetiapine doses, P = .123 for lithium, vs placebo). Quetiapine 600 mg/d was significantly more effective than lithium in improving MADRS total score at week 8 (P = .013). Quetiapine-treated (both doses), but not lithium-treated, patients showed significant improvements (P < .05) in MADRS response and remission rates, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar-Severity of Illness and -Change, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) scores at week 8 versus placebo. Both quetiapine doses were more effective than lithium at week 8 on the HDRS and HARS. The most common adverse events were somnolence, dry mouth, and dizziness with quetiapine (both doses) and nausea with lithium.
CONCLUSIONS
Quetiapine (300 or 600 mg/d) was more effective than placebo for the treatment of episodes of acute depression in bipolar disorder. Lithium did not significantly differ from placebo on the main measures of efficacy. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00206141.
目的
本研究旨在比较喹硫平与锂单药治疗与安慰剂治疗双相情感障碍重性抑郁发作的疗效和耐受性。
方法
802 例符合 DSM-IV 诊断标准的双相情感障碍患者(499 例双相 I 型,303 例双相 II 型)被随机分配至喹硫平 300mg/d(n=265)、喹硫平 600mg/d(n=268)、锂 600-1800mg/d(n=136)或安慰剂(n=133)治疗 8 周。主要终点是蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分的变化。研究于 2005 年 8 月至 2007 年 5 月进行。
结果
治疗 8 周后,喹硫平 300mg/d、喹硫平 600mg/d、锂、安慰剂组的 MADRS 总分较基线的平均变化分别为-15.4、-16.1、-13.6、-11.8(两种喹硫平剂量组均 P<0.001,与锂相比 P=0.123)。喹硫平 600mg/d 组在第 8 周时的 MADRS 总分改善情况明显优于锂组(P=0.013)。喹硫平治疗(两种剂量)而非锂治疗的患者在第 8 周时 MADRS 反应率和缓解率、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)、临床总体印象-双相严重程度和变化、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HARS)评分均有显著改善(P<0.05)。两种喹硫平剂量在第 8 周时对 HDRS 和 HARS 的疗效均优于锂。最常见的不良反应是喹硫平(两种剂量)治疗的患者出现嗜睡、口干和头晕,而锂治疗的患者出现恶心。
结论
喹硫平(300 或 600mg/d)在治疗双相情感障碍的急性抑郁发作方面优于安慰剂。锂在主要疗效指标上与安慰剂无显著差异。两种治疗方法均具有良好的耐受性。
试验注册
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00206141。